The orexigenic peptide ghrelin stimulates both food intake and growth hormone release and is synthesized in the stomach and in hypothalamic areas involved in feeding control. The suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus (SCN) control most circadian rhythms, although there is evidence that some oscillators, such as food-entrainable oscillators, can drive activity rhythms even after SCN ablation. Ghrelin levels exhibit a circadian rhythm and closely follow feeding schedules, making this peptide a putative candidate for food-related entraining signals. We examined the response of the SCN to ghrelin treatments in vitro, by means of electrophysiological and bioluminescence recordings, and in vivo, by assessing effects on the phase of locomotor activity rhythms. Ghrelin applied at circadian time 6 in vitro to cultured SCN slices induced an ϳ3 h phase advance. In addition, ghrelin phase advanced the rhythm of PER2::LUC (Period2::Luciferase) expression in cultured SCN explants from mPer2Luc transgenic mice. In vivo, intraperitoneal administration of ghrelin or a synthetic analog, growth hormone-releasing protein-6 (GHRP-6), to ad libitum fed animals failed to alter circadian phase. When injected after 30 h of food deprivation, GHRP-6 induced a phase advance compared with saline-injected animals. These results indicate that ghrelin may play a role in the circadian system by exerting a direct action on the SCN and that the system as a whole may become sensitive to ghrelin and other feeding-related neuropeptides under conditions of food restriction.

No abstract

No abstract

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is delivered to the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) circadian pacemaker via an input from the thalamic intergeniculate leaflet. NPY can inhibit light-induced responses of the circadian system of Syrian hamsters. Here we studied whether an antagonist to NPY receptors can be used to potentiate photic phase shifts late in the subjective night. First we determined by in situ hybridization that both NPY Y1 and Y5 receptor mRNA are expressed in the SCN of Syrian hamsters. Second, similar to our previous findings at Zeitgeber time 14 (ZT 14, where ZT 12 was the time of lights off), we found that NPY applied at ZT 18.5 onto the SCN region of brain slices maintained in vitro could block NMDA-induced phase advances of the spontaneous firing rate rhythm, and this blocking effect was probably mediated by the Y5 receptor, since co-application of Y5 receptor antagonists completely reversed the effect of NPY, while application of a Y1 receptor antagonist had no effect under the same conditions. Third, we found that co-treatment with a Y5 receptor antagonist in vivo (s.c., 10 mg/kg) not only reversed the effect of NPY applied to the SCN in vivo through a cannula but also significantly potentiated the light-induced phase advance in the absence of NPY. This is the first report of a NPY receptor antagonist having such an effect, and indicates that NPY Y5 receptor antagonists could be clinically useful for potentiating circadian system responses to light.

Circadian or daily rhythms generated from the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus can be synchronized by light and nonphotic stimuli. Whereas glutamate mediates photic information, nonphotic information can in some cases be mediated by neuropeptide Y (NPY) or serotonin. NPY or serotonin can reduce the phase-resetting effect of light or glutamate; however, the mechanisms and level of interaction of these two kinds of stimuli are unknown. Here we investigate the effect of NPY on the NMDA-induced phase shift of the hamster SCN circadian neural activity rhythm by means of single-unit recording techniques. NMDA (10-100 microm) applied in the early subjective night induced phase delays in the time of peak firing, whereas doses in the millimolar range disrupted firing patterns. The NMDA-induced phase delay was blocked by coapplication of NPY (0.02-200 microm). NPY Y1/Y5 and Y5 receptor agonists, but not the Y2 receptor agonist, blocked the NMDA-induced phase delay in a similar manner as NPY. The coapplication of a Y5 but not Y1 receptor antagonist eliminated NPY blockade of NMDA-induced phase delays, suggesting that the Y5 receptor is capable of mediating the inhibitory effect of NPY on photic responses. These results indicate that nonphotic and photic stimuli may interact at a level at or beyond NMDA receptor response and indicate that the Y5 receptor is involved in this interaction. Alteration of Y5 receptor function may therefore be expected to alter synchronization of circadian rhythms to light.