OBJECTIVETo evaluate whether postprandial blood glucose predicts cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes in a long-term follow-up taking into account A1C and the main cardiovascular risk factors.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSConsecutive type 2 diabetic patients (n = 505) followed up at our diabetes clinic were evaluated at baseline (1995) for the main cardiovascular risk factors and for five glycemic control parameters (fasting blood glucose, blood glucose 2 h after breakfast, blood glucose 2 h after lunch, blood glucose before dinner, and A1C); all-cause mortality and the first cardiovascular events occurring during the 14-year follow-up were measured.RESULTSWe observed 172 cardiovascular events (34.1% of the population) and 147 deaths (29.1% of the population). Using the Cox analysis with the backward method, we categorized the variables according to the therapeutic targets of the American Diabetes Association. Our observations were as follows. When the five glycemic control parameters were considered together, the predictors were 1) for cardiovascular events, blood glucose 2 h after lunch (hazard ratio 1.507, P = 0.010) and A1C (1.792, P = 0.002); and 2) for mortality, blood glucose 2 h after lunch (1.885, P < 0.0001) and A1C (1.907, P = 0.002). When blood glucose 2 h after lunch and A1C were considered together with the main cardiovascular risk factors, the following glycemic control parameters were predictors: 1) for cardiovascular events, blood glucose 2 h after lunch (1.452, P = 0.021) and A1C (1.732, P = 0.004); and 2) for mortality, blood glucose 2 h after lunch (1.846, P = 0.001) and A1C (1.896, P = 0.004).CONCLUSIONSIn type 2 diabetes, both postprandial blood glucose and A1C predict cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in a long-term follow-up.
The insulin anti-aggregating effect is preserved in lean NIDDM; platelet sensitivity to GTN in preserved in lean NIDDM but is reduced in the insulin-resistant states of obesity and obese NIDDM. Resistance to nitrates, therefore, could be considered another feature of the insulin-resistance syndrome.
The insulin-induced platelet anti-aggregating effect is attributed to a nitric oxide (NO)-mediated increase of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). The aim of this work, carried out in human platelets, is to show whether insulin increases NO synthesis in platelets and whether it enhances not only cGMP but also cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in these cells. We observed that 1) insulin dose-dependently increases NO production, evaluated as citrulline synthesis from L-arginine (n = 4, P = 0.015); 2) insulin dose-dependently increases not only cGMP but also cAMP: for instance, after 8 min of insulin incubation at 1,920 pmol/l, cAMP increased from 39.8 +/- 1.4 to 121.3 +/- 12.6 pmol/10(9) platelets (n = 16, P = 0.0001); 3) when insulin is incubated for 120 min, the increase of cGMP and cAMP shows a plateau between 2 and 20 min, and while the effect on cGMP is significant until 120 min, the effect on cAMP is no more significant at 60 and 120 min; 4) insulin increases the effects on cAMP of the adenylate cyclase agonists Iloprost and forskolin (n = 5, P = 0.0001) and enhances their platelet anti-aggregating effects (n = 6 and 8, respectively; P = 0.0001); and 5) the inhibition of NO synthase by N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine blunts both the insulin effects on basal cGMP and cAMP (n = 4) and those on the Iloprost- and forskolin-induced cAMP increase (n = 5). Thus, insulin increases NO synthesis in human platelets, and, through NO, enhances both cGMP and cAMP. The platelet anti-aggregating effect exerted by insulin is, therefore, a NO-mediated phenomenon involving both cGMP and cAMP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.