CSII therapy achieves and maintains its efficacy mainly in terms of reducing severe hypoglycaemia. In the whole group of patients, the reduction in HbA1c is transient and disappears after 5 years.
Although a transient phenomenon, PCGM can be useful in the short term in improving metabolic and clinical profile of suboptimally controlled T1DM subjects, including those with repeated hypoglycemia.
Background.
Allosensitization has been reported after discontinuation of immunosuppression following graft failure in islet transplantation (ITx) recipients, though duration of its persistence is unknown.
Methods.
We evaluated 35 patients with type 1 diabetes who received ITx, including 17 who developed graft failure (ITx alone, n = 13; ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cells, n = 4) and 18 with persistent graft function. Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) was measured yearly for the duration of graft function within 1 y after graft failure at enrollment and yearly thereafter.
Results.
In ITx alone graft failure patients, 61% (8/13) were PRA-positive at 6 y postgraft failure, and 46% (6/13) developed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA to 2 ± 1 donors) during follow-up. The degree of sensitization was variable (cPRA ranging between 22% and 100% after graft failure). Allosensitization persisted for 7–15 y. Three subjects (3/13) were not allosensitized. In ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cell recipients, cPRA-positivity (88%–98%) and DSA positivity persisted for 15 y in 75% (3/4) of subjects.
Conclusions.
Allosensitization was minimal while subjects remained on immunosuppression, but after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy, the majority of subjects (77%) became allosensitized with persistence of PRA positivity for up to 15 y. Persistence of allosensitization in this patient population is of clinical importance as it may result in longer transplant waiting list times for identification of a suitable donor in the case of requiring a subsequent transplant.
Allosensitization (PRA+) has been reported after discontinuation of immunosuppression (IS) following graft failure (GF) in islet transplant (ITx) recipients. Persistence of PRA+ after GF is unknown.
Thirteen ITx alone (IA) and 5 ITx subjects who also received donor CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (IBM) and developed GF enrolled in the study “Allosensitization After Islet Transplantation.” Panel reactive antibodies (PRA) were measured yearly while having graft function, within 1 year post-GF and yearly after study enrollment. Two subjects who developed GF but remained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for 2 years and 18 subjects with persistent graft function (15 IA and 3 islet after kidney [IAK]) were also evaluated.
80% IBM subjects developed high PRA+ (>89%) (Figure 1a) while 70% IA subjects were PRA+ at enrollment (0.8-6 years post-GF) and 42%-55% were PRA+ throughout follow-up. PRA results were variable (Figure 1b). The 2 subjects taking MMF post-GF and 1 subject who required IVIG pre-GF (for parvovirus infection) were not PRA+. Four subjects with persistent graft function by 10 years became PRA+ (2 IA and 2 IAK; Figure 1c).
After stopping IS, 70% IA subjects became PRA+ with persistence of PRA (although variable) for at least 10 years post-GF. PRA+ was higher in IBM compared to IA subjects. While receiving IS, PRA+ was minimal. Persistence of PRA+ remains a concern due to potentially prolonged wait list time for subsequent organ transplantation if needed.
Disclosure
P. Rios: None. D. Baidal: None. N. Padilla: None. A.M. Alvarez Gil: None. S. Madiraju: None. J. Ambut: None. A.M. Mantero: None. S. Messinger Cayetano: None. C. Ricordi: None. R. Alejandro: None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.