The effects of time-of-day preferences on selective attention were tested in 2 experiments after normative work with 975 younger adults and 143 older adults verified C. P. May, L. Hasher, and E. R. finding that most older adults prefer the morning, whereas younger adults prefer activities later in the day. In Experiment 1, the cognitive effects of testing at preferred or nonpreferred times of day were examined in negative priming and related paradigms because (a) older adults typically have not shown negative priming and (b) previous research has not taken preference and testing times into account. In contrast to those tested at nonpreferred times, both younger and older groups tested at their preferred times showed negative priming. Age or testing optimality also affected other priming tasks. The central results were replicated in Experiment 2, which tested younger and older adults at their preferred times of the middle of the day.

The study of visuo-spatial imagery abilities in totally congenitally blind people may be instrumental in understanding the contribution of visual experience to imagery processes. In the present paper visuo-spatial imagery capacity was explored through a task devised by Kerr (1987) and adapted for presentation to the blind, in which subjects were asked to imagine either two- or three-dimensional matrices of different complexity and to follow a mental pathway. The first experiment showed that blind people have difficulty with three-dimensional matrices which are within the reach of sighted people, and that their performance is affected by the processing rate. In the second experiment the spatial and pictorial components of visual imagery were analyzed by way of the same spatial task and of a pictorial-tactual task in which subjects had to match a mental representation of a pathway to a tactually explored wire silhouette. On the latter task, blind people did not meet any particular difficulty, probably because they could form representations using other sensory modalities and because they were skillful in tactual exploration. These data suggest that research on the blind cannot easily contribute to the distinction between the spatial and pictorial components of visual imagery.

No abstract

No abstract