Background: Lung ultrasound is a non-radiating accurate alternative tool to chest X-ray (CXR) in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults. Objectives: The aim of our study was to define the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CAP in children. Methods: 107 consecutive children with suspected CAP underwent clinical examination, blood sample analysis, CXR and lung ultrasound on admission to the Pediatric Department of the San Paolo Hospital. The diagnosis of pneumonia was made by an independent committee of physicians on the basis of the overall clinical and CXR data. Results: The diagnosis of CAP was confirmed by the committee in 81 patients (76%). Ultrasound and CXR were performed in all patients. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 96%, while CXR showed a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 94%. In patients with CAP, ultrasound revealed subpleural consolidations with air bronchogram in 70 cases and focal B-lines in 6. A parapneumonic pleural effusion was detected in 17 patients by ultrasound, while only 11 of them could be detected by CXR. Conclusions: In our series, lung ultrasound was highly accurate for the diagnosis of CAP in hospitalized children. These results provide the rationale for a multicenter study in children.
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment are key to prevent Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission. Bronchoscopy can play a primary role in pulmonary TB diagnosis, particularly for suspected patients with scarce sputum or sputum smear negativity, and with endobronchial disease. Bronchoscopic needle aspiration techniques are accurate and safe means adopted to investigate hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes in cases of suspected TB lymphadenopathy. Tracheobronchial stenosis represents the worst complication of endobronchial tuberculosis. Bronchoscopic procedures are less invasive therapeutic strategies than conventional surgery to be adopted in the management of TB-related stenosis. We conducted a non-systematic review aimed at describing the scientific literature on the role of bronchoscopic techniques in the diagnosis and therapy of patients with TB. We focused on three main areas of interventions: bronchoscopic diagnosis of smear negative/sputum scarce TB patients, endobronchial TB diagnosis and treatment and needle aspiration techniques for intrathoracic TB lymphadenopathy. We described experiences on bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial washing, and biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of patients with tracheobronchial and pulmonary TB; furthermore, we described the role played by conventional and ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of suspected hilar and mediastinal TB adenopathy. Finally, we assessed the role of the bronchoscopic therapy in the treatment of endobronchial TB and its complications, focusing on dilation techniques (such as balloon dilation and airway stenting) and ablative procedures (both heat and cold therapies).
Haemoptysis, which is a challenging symptom accounting for 10-15% of all pulmonology consultations, may be associated with life-threatening medical conditions such as lung cancer [1-7]. Its aetiology and epidemiology vary widely among studies according to geographic locations and time of publication, epidemiological design, and diagnostic tests employed [2-8]. Bronchiectasis, malignancies, post-tuberculosis sequelae, and idiopathic bleedings have been recognised as the most frequent causes of haemoptysis in Europe over the last decade [3-7]. No guidelines exist suggesting an optimal work-up of symptoms, and data on the diagnostic yield of the most commonly prescribed examinations are limited [8]. The aim of this observational, prospective, multicentre study was to investigate the haemoptysis aetiology in association with its severity in an Italian population. We also evaluated the diagnostic yield of the prescribed diagnostic tests. The study was approved by the ethical committees of five Italian participating hospitals and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02045394). Written informed consent was signed by the recruited patients, who were followed-up for 18 months. Herein, we report the findings of the baseline assessment. From July 2013 to September 2015, consecutive adult (i.e. ⩾18 years old) patients with haemoptysis were considered eligible. The following were considered as exclusion criteria: 1) aetiology of haemoptysis already detected (e.g. proven cancer-related and/or bronchiectasis-related haemoptysis); and 2) refusal to sign the informed consent. Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of the total amount of blood expectorated in 24 h [2, 3, 9]: mild (i.e. drops of blood to 20 mL in 24 h), moderate (i.e. 20-500 mL in 24 h), and severe (i.e. >500 mL in 24 h). All enrolled patients underwent physical examination and blood analysis. Subsequent tests deemed necessary for the diagnosis (i.e. sputum cultures, chest radiography, multi-detector chest computed tomography (CT), bronchoscopy, otorhinolaryngological evaluation, angiography) were chosen by the attending clinician on the basis of the clinical hypothesis and the symptom-driven diagnostic protocols of each hospital involved in the study. Final diagnosis was established in each centre, on the basis of the clinical and imaging evidence, by a multidisciplinary consensus that involved pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists and otorhinolaryngologists. An electronic ad hoc form was created to collect demographic, epidemiological and clinical variables. Absolute and relative frequencies were used to summarise qualitative variables. Quantitative variables, for which the non-parametric distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test, were summarised with medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). 95% confidence intervals were computed to provide an interval estimation. The statistical software used for all the computations was Stata13.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). During the study period, 606 patients (median age 67...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.