on behalf of the International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) Investigators* Background-In patients with syncope and bundle branch block (BBB), syncope is suspected to be attributable to a paroxysmal atrioventricular (AV) block, but little is known of its mechanism when electrophysiological study is negative. Methods and Results-We applied an implantable loop recorder in 52 patients with BBB and negative conventional workup. During a follow-up of 3 to 15 months, syncope recurred in 22 patients (42%), the event being documented in 19 patients after a median of 48 days. The most frequent finding, recorded in 17 patients, was one or more prolonged asystolic pause mainly attributable to AV block; the remaining 2 patients had normal sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia. The onset of the bradycardic episodes was always sudden but was sometimes preceded by ventricular premature beats. The median duration of the arrhythmic event was 47 seconds. An additional 3 patients developed nonsyncopal persistent III-degree AV block, and 2 patients had presyncope attributable to AV block with asystole. No patients suffered injury attributable to syncopal relapse. Conclusions-In patients with BBB and negative electrophysiological study, most syncopal recurrences have a homogeneous mechanism that is characterized by prolonged asystolic pauses, mainly attributable to sudden-onset paroxysmal AV block.

Isometric arm contraction is able to abort impending vasovagal syncope by increasing systemic BP. Arm counter-pressure maneuvers can be proposed as a new, feasible, safe, and well accepted first-line treatment for vasovagal syncope.

No abstract

Background— In the Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3), cardiac pacing was effective in reducing recurrence of syncope in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope (NMS) and documented asystole but syncope still recurred in 25% of them at 2 years. We have investigated the role of tilt testing (TT) in predicting recurrences. Methods and Results— In 136 patients enrolled in the ISSUE-3, TT was positive in 76 and negative in 60. An asystolic response predicted a similar asystolic form during implantable loop recorder monitoring, with a positive predictive value of 86%. The corresponding values were 48% in patients with non–asystolic TT and 58% in patients with negative TT ( P =0.001 versus asystolic TT). Fifty-two patients (26 TT+ and 26 TT–) with asystolic neurally mediated syncope received a pacemaker. Syncope recurred in 8 TT+ and in 1 TT– patients. At 21 months, the estimated product-limit syncope recurrence rates were 55% and 5%, respectively ( P =0.004). The TT+ recurrence rate was similar to that seen in 45 untreated patients (control group), which was 64% ( P =0.75). The recurrence rate was similar between 14 patients with asystolic and 12 with non–asystolic responses during TT ( P =0.53). Conclusions— Cardiac pacing was effective in neurally mediated syncope patients with documented asystolic episodes in whom TT was negative; conversely, there was insufficient evidence of efficacy from this data set in patients with a positive TT even when spontaneous asystole was documented. Present observations are unexpected and need to be confirmed by other studies. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01463358.

The mechanism of syncope is different in patients with and without SHD; diagnostic yield and safety are similar in both groups. About 28% of patients with unexplained syncope have an indication to ILR implantation. The need for ILR implantation in the general population is 34 implants/million inhabitants/year.