Hypothermic machine perfusion (HPM) grants a better postoperative outcome in transplantation of organs procured from extended criteria donors (ECDs) and donors after cardiac death (DCD). So far, the only available parameter for outcome prediction concerning those organs is pretransplant biopsy score. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether renal resistance (RR) trend during HPM may be used as a predictive marker for post-transplantation outcome. From December 2015 to present, HMP has been systematically applied to all organs from ECDs and DCD. All grafts underwent pretransplantation biopsy evaluation using Karpinski's histological score. Only organs that reached RR value ≤1.0 within 3 hours of perfusion were transplanted. Single kidney transplantation (SKT) or double kidney transplantation (DKT) were performed according to biopsy score results. Sixty-five HMPs were performed (58 from ECDs and 7 from DCD/ECMO donors). Fifteen kidneys were insufficiently reconditioned (RR > 1) and were therefore discarded. Forty-nine kidneys were transplanted, divided between 21 SKT and 14 DKT. Overall primary nonfunction (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF) rate were 2.9 and 17.1%, respectively. DGF were more common in kidneys from DCD (67 vs. 7%; P = 0.004). Biopsy score did not correlate with PNF/DGF rate (P = 0.870) and postoperative creatinine trend (P = 0.796). Recipients of kidneys that reached RR ≤ 1.0 within 1 hour of HMP had a lower PNF/DGF rate (11 vs. 44%; P = 0.033) and faster serum creatinine decrease (POD10 creatinine: 1.79 mg/dL vs. 4.33 mg/dL; P = 0.019). RR trend is more predictive of post-transplantation outcome than biopsy score. Hence, RR trend should be taken into account in the pretransplantation evaluation of the organs.
No differences were observed in surgical outcome in IMA ligation and preservation groups, particularly preservation or ligation of the IMA did not affect leakage rate.
Background Laparoscopic sphincter saving rectal resection for low rectal cancer is hampered by narrow pelvis and limitations of current stapling devices [1]. The APPEAR (Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection of the Rectum) was proposed by Williams et al. [2,3] as an alternative to the abdominal-perineal resection to perform very low rectal resection and anastomosis through a perineal wound. We adapted the original technique to the laparoscopic approach, avoiding any other abdominal incision. Methods Between December 2011 and April 2012, five patients (2 females; median age 72 years (range 60-78)) with rectal cancer not involving the sphincters underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) with APPEAR. Mean distance of the tumor from anal verge was 3.2 ± 1.1 cm (range 2-5). Results All of the procedures were completed laparoscopically. All of the anastomoses were stapled, and a protective stoma was always constructed. The surgical specimens were retrieved from the perineal wound, and the stoma performed through one of the port sites, without any further abdominal incision. Mean operative time was 333 ± 47 min (range 295-405), postoperative stay 12 ± 5 days (range 6-17). Perineal wound infection was observed in three patients, two of whom also had anastomotic fistula, and was treated conservatively with prolonged suction drainage. Histological examination showed three pT3N?, one T2N0, and one complete response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, with a mean distal clear margin of 1.27 ± 0.5 cm (range 0.5-1.7). After a median follow-up of 9 months (range 8-12), one stoma reversal has been performed and the patient is fully continent. Conclusions Our experience shows the feasibility of the APPEAR technique with laparoscopic TME, without any other abdominal incision. This technique offers advantage over the limitations of current laparoscopic stapling devices and their scanty maneuverability in the pelvis, allowing resection and anastomosis under direct vision, with adequate distal clearance, while sparing the anal sphincters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.