Abstract. The Enguri dam and water reservoir, nested in the southwestern Caucasus
(Republic of Georgia), are surrounded by steep mountain slopes. At a distance
of 2.5 km from the dam, a mountain ridge along the reservoir is affected by
active deformations with a double vergence. The western slope, directly
facing the reservoir, has deformations that affect a subaerial area of
1.2 km2. The head scarp affects the Jvari–Khaishi–Mestia main road
with offsets of man-made features that indicate slip rates of
2–9 cm yr−1. Static, pseudostatic and Newmark analyses, based on
field and seismological data, suggest different unstable rock volumes based
on the environmental conditions. An important effect of variation of the
water table is shown, as well as the possible destabilization of the slope
following seismic shaking, compatible with the expected local peak ground
acceleration. This worst-case scenario corresponds to an unstable volume on
the order of up to 48±12×106 m3. The opposite, eastern
slope of the same mountain ridge is also affected by wide deformation
affecting an area of 0.37 km2. Here, field data indicate
2–5 cm yr−1 of slip rates. All this evidence is interpreted as
resulting from two similar landslides, whose possible causes are discussed,
comprising seismic triggering, mountain rapid uplift, river erosion and lake
variations.
Our research focuses on Holocene tectonics in a broad area surrounding the junction between the active NW-SE trending Husavik-Flatey transform fault (HFF) and the N-S Gudfinnugja normal fault (GF), an exceptional example of onshore transform-ridge intersection. We mapped 637 minor and major faults, and measured the dip-slip and strike-slip offset components on the major faults. We also mapped 1016 individual fissures, as well as opening directions on the most reliable ones. The results indicate that this portion of the HFF comprises major right-stepping segments, with both normal and right-lateral strike-slip components, linked by local normal faults. The entire GF always shows pure dip-slip normal displacements, with a strong decrease in offset at the junction with the HFF. Fissure opening directions are in the range N45°-65°E along the HFF, N90°E along the GF, and N110°E within the area south of the HFF and west of the GF. Fault kinematics and fissure openings suggest a displacement field in good agreement with most of present-day GPS measurements, although our data indicate the possible long-term Holocene effects of the 2 superimposition of magma-related stresses on the regional tectonic stresses. The HFF and the GF work together as a structural system able to accommodate differential crustal block motion, and possibly past dyke intrusions.
This work is aimed at reviewing the current state of the art in geosite selection, assessment, and communication. We first highlight the main papers that have defined paramount concepts such as geodiversity, geoheritage, and geosites. We then delve into the theoretical principles and guidelines that have been proposed over the last twenty years by researchers who have thoroughly illustrated how to individuate and assess geosites. In doing so, we illustrate notable field examples of applications of qualitative and quantitative assessments of geosites in places such as Serbia, India, Iceland, Ecuador, Sardinia (Italy), Egypt, Tasmania (Australia), and Brazil. The third part of this work is dedicated to illustrating a list (by no means exhaustive) of works that have tried to come up with innovative tools, strategies, and solutions to promote and communicate geosites. From our work, it appears that geosites can be extremely effective as fully fledged outreach tools capable of bridging the gap between Earth science and the lay public.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.