Background and objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (KO) is one of the most common joint diseases, determining knee pain and reduction of mobility, with a negative effect on quality of life. Intra-articular injections of different formulations of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are an increasingly common non-surgical treatment for KO. Recently, in order to combine the anti-inflammatory effect of platelet rich plasma and the viscosupplementation effect of hyaluronic acid, a formulation of PRP combined with hyaluronic acid (PRP + HA) has been proposed. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of plasma with high concentration of platelets and leukocytes (L-PRP) with PRP + HA in patients with mild to moderate (Kellgren–Lawrence scale II-III grade) KO. Materials and Methods: Among the 51 patients included, 28 have been treated with L-PRP, while 23 with PRP + HA. A retrospective evaluation at baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1) and 1 year (T2) has been performed. The outcome analyzed are the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Visuo Analogic Scale (VAS) (at T0, T1, and T2) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (T0 and T2). We evaluated change in mean scores within and between groups among different time points using repeated measures ANCOVA. Results: Although the two treatments have been both effective in reducing VAS, the group treated with PRP + HA showed a significantly lower KSS. Conclusions: Our results show that the use of both treatments may help to reduce pain in patients with mild to moderate KO. PRP + HA showed better results in improving knee mobility and function. These results should be considered only preliminary: Further research is needed to completely describe the clinical effectiveness of these formulations.

Background Congenital and bilateral dislocation of the knee is an uncommon disorder; it may be isolated or combined with other congenital muscoloskeletal disorders, associated with neurologic disorders or occur in syndromic conditions. The knee presents a typical pathologic hyperextension, with or without joint dislocation. If untreated, the knee may develop stiffness or instability. Case Summary We report about a new-born baby girl presented at birth with an unusual position of both lower limbs with obvious hyperextended knees. Starting from the first hours of life, this baby was treated conservatively with reduction and serial cast immobilizations of the limbs. At the end of the treatment (21 days of life), the knees appeared completely corrected with physiologic active and passive range of motion and joint stability, and they were left free. Conclusion A correct evaluation at birth, both of the newborn and the deformity, is mandatory in order to decide the proper treatment, that could be conservative or surgical. A prompt treatment can be very effective to completely resolve the problem.

Hip osteoarthritis (HOA) leads to pain and reduced function. The use of intra-articular injections based on corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or hyaluronic acid (HA) is becoming a common symptomatic therapy for HOA. For the first time, we compare the effectiveness of plasma with a high concentration of platelets and leukocytes (L-PRP) with PRP+HA in patients with mild to moderate HOA. A total of 26 patients in each group were administered with either L-PRP or PRP+HA. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year after the injection. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) and Harris hip score (HHS) within and between groups among different time points were compared using repeated measures ANCOVA (age set as a covariate). Both treatments were effective in reducing VAS, but not in significantly increasing HHS. In the group treated with L-PRP, VAS showed interaction between time and treatment (in favor of L-PRP). Pairwise comparison for treatment and time point evidenced a significant difference at 1-year follow-up between L-PRP and PRP-HA. Outcomes support the idea that both treatments may be effective in reducing pain, with maximal pain reduction achieved after 3 months. L-PRP showed better results in reducing VAS over time. Both treatments are effective at reducing pain in the short to medium term. L-PRP could be the treatment of choice due to a more marked effect over time. Nevertheless, further research is needed to better describe the clinical outcome of these formulations.

No abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KO) is one of the most common joint diseases, often determining knee pain and reduction of mobility with impact on the overall quality of life of the patients. Intra-articular injections of different formulations of platelet rich plasma (PRP) are an increasingly common non-surgical treatment for KO. Recently, in order to combine the antinflammatory effect of platelet rich plasma and the viscosupplementation effect of hyaluronic acid, a formulation of plasma with relatively low concentration of platelets and very few leukocytes combined with hyaluronic acid (PRP+HA) has been proposed. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of plasma with high concentration of platelets and leukocytes (L-PRP) with PRP+HA in patients with mild to moderate (Kellegren-Lawrence scale II-III grade) KO.Materials and Methods: Among the 51 patients included, 28 have been treated with L-PRP, while 23 with PRP+HA. A retrospective evaluation at baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1) and 1 year (T2) has been performed. The outcome analyzed are the Knee Society Score(KSS), the Visuo Analogic Scale (VAS) (at T0,T1 and T2) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(KOOS) (T0 and T2).We evaluated change in mean scores within group among different time points using repeated measures ANOVA or paired t-test. Comparison between different groups of treatment has been performed using mixed ANOVA.Results: The main finding is that, although the two treatments have been both effective, PRP+HA determined significantly better functional status, pain and mobility, measured with KSS.Discussion: We observed a significant effect of the two formulations in exam in all the outcomes in analysis: both treatments were effective in improving pain, knee functional status and symptoms, and the benefits persisted after 3 and 12 months from the infiltrative therapy. Nevertheless, patients who received PRP+HA injections presented higher knee mobility and better function (measured by KSS score) after one year.Conclusions: This work compares clinical outcomes of L-PRP and PRP+HA treatment in patients with KO. Our results encourage the use of one of the two treatments in patients with mild to moderate KO. When possible, we suggest to the use of PRP+HA formulation, because it may determine better results in improving knee function and mobility.