Autoinhibition is being widely used in nature to repress otherwise constitutive protein activities and is typically regulated by extrinsic factors. Here we show that autoinhibition can be controlled by an intrinsic intramolecular switch afforded by prolyl cis-trans isomerization. We find that a proline on the linker tethering the two SH3 domains of the Crk adaptor protein interconverts between the cis and trans conformation. In the cis conformation, the two SH3 domains interact intramolecularly, thereby forming the basis of an autoinhibitory mechanism. Conversely, in the trans conformation Crk exists in an extended, uninhibited conformation that is marginally populated but serves to activate the protein upon ligand binding. Interconversion between the cis and trans, and, hence, of the autoinhibited and activated conformations, is accelerated by the action of peptidyl-prolyl isomerases. Proline isomerization appears to make an ideal switch that can regulate the kinetics of activation, thereby modulating the dynamics of signal response.
Proline switches, controlled by cis–trans isomerization, have emerged as a particularly effective regulatory mechanism in a wide range of biological processes. Here we report the structures of both the cis and trans conformers of a proline switch in Crk signaling protein. Proline isomerization toggles Crk between two conformations: an autoinhibitory, stabilized by the intramolecular association of two tandem SH3 domains in the cis form, and an uninhibited, activated conformation promoted by the trans form. In addition to acting as a structural switch the heterogeneous proline recruits cyclophilin A, which accelerates the interconversion rate between the isomers thereby regulating the kinetics of Crk activation. The data provide atomic insight into the mechanisms that underpin the functionality of this binary switch and elucidate its remarkable efficiency. The results also reveal novel SH3 binding surfaces highlighting the binding versatility and expanding the non-canonical ligand repertoire of this important signaling domain.
Cell wall biosynthesis inhibitors (CBIs) have historically been one of the most effective classes of antibiotics. They are the most extensively used class of antibiotics and their importance is exemplified by the β-lactams and glycopeptide antibiotics. However, this class of antibiotics has not received impunity from resistance development. In the wake of this predicament, this review presents the progress of CBIs, especially glycopeptide derivatives as antibiotics to confront antibacterial resistance. The various strategies used for the development of CBIs, their clinical status and possible directions in which this field can evolve have also been discussed.
Vancomycin, a natural glycopeptide
antibiotic, was used as the
antibiotic of last resort for the treatment of multidrug-resistant
Gram-positive bacterial infections. However, almost 30 years after
its use, resistance to vancomycin was first reported in 1986 in France.
This became a major health concern, and alternative treatment strategies
were urgently needed. New classes of molecules, including semisynthetic
antibacterial compounds and newer generations of the previously used
antibiotics, were developed. Semisynthetic derivatives of vancomycin
with enhanced binding affinity, membrane disruption ability, and lipid
binding properties have exhibited promising results against both Gram-positive
and Gram-negative bacteria. Various successful approaches developed
to overcome the acquired resistance in Gram-positive bacteria, intrinsic
resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, and other forms of noninherited
resistance to vancomycin have been discussed in this Perspective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.