Background
While mammalian embryos can adapt to their environments, their sensitivity overshadows their adaptability in suboptimal
in vitro
conditions. Therefore, the environment in which the gametes are fertilized or to which the embryo is exposed can greatly affect the quality of the embryo and consequently its implantation potential.
Objectives
Since providing an optimal culture condition needs a deep understanding of the environmental effects, and regarding the fact that normal morphology fails to be a reliable indicator of natural embryo development, the current study aimed at comparing
in vivo
- and
in vitro
-derived blastocysts at the molecular level.
Materials and Methods
In vivo
and
in vitro
mouse blastocysts were obtained by flushing the uterine horns and
in vitro
fertilization/culture, respectively. Normal blastocysts of both groups were evaluated in terms of hatching rate and expression of three lineage-differentiation-, apoptosis-, and implantation-related genes.
Results
The hatching rate was lower in
In vitro
fertilization (IVF)-produced blastocysts in comparison with that of the
in vivo
counterparts. More importantly, the study results indicated significant changes in the expression levels of eight out of ten selected genes, especially
Mmp-9
(about -10.7-fold). The expression of
Mmp-9
in trophoblast cells is required for successful implantation and trophoblast invasion.
Conclusions
The current study, in addition to confirming that the altered gene expression pattern of
in vitro
-produced embryos resulted in normal morphology, provided a possible reason for lower implantation rate of
in vitro
-produced blastocysts regarding the
Mmp-9
expression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.