Background: With an incidence of 50% of humerus fractures, proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) can significantly impact one's quality of life. Moreover, management of highly comminuted or displaced PHFs poses a significant challenge amongst elderly population due to poor bone quality. Prosthetic replacement of humeral head or its stabilization using external plates is a commonly employed intervention for treating three-and four-part PHFs. Thus, these two methods were compared in this study to identify a preferable intervention.Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS®, Synthes, Switzerland) plating and Neer's hemiarthroplasty. The deltopectoral approach was deployed as the surgical method. Their surgical outcome was assessed from functional range of motion (ROM) and Constant-Murley scores at regular intervals of three, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks.Results: Twenty patients were divided into two groups who received PHILOS ® plating and Neer's hemiarthroplasty, averaged 67.2 years and 72.8 years. The ROM pertaining to flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation for individuals with PHILOS ® plating was 20%, 12.5%, 14.7%, 11.5%, and 18.5% higher than those who received Neer's hemiarthroplasty. Moreover, the Murley score was also 8.7 units higher for individuals with PHILOS ® plating.Conclusions: Prognosis following PHILOS® plate osteosynthesis had a better overall outcome than hemiarthroplasty with Neer's prosthesis. Although hemiarthroplasty yielded a consistent functional outcome, PHILOS® plate osteosynthesis tends to restore a greater ROM. Thus, PHILOS® plating is recommended as the suitable method to manage three-and four-part PHF for people above fifty-five years of age.

No abstract

BackgroundDistal radial fractures (DRFs) are a prevalent form of skeletal injuries that hinder a person from performing daily living activities. Although several treatment modalities have been established to manage DRF, an optimal intervention has not been identified for comminuted fractures. The use of locking compression plates (LCPs) is gaining popularity for fractures that cannot be anatomically reduced because they offer better stability and early recovery. Thus, this study aims to investigate the surgical outcome of comminuted intra-articular DRFs treated with LCPs. MethodologyWe performed open reduction and internal fixation in 30 patients (18 males and 12 females) with DRF and were followed up at regular intervals following the surgery (at three, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks). The surgical outcome was assessed both from functional and radiological standpoints. The influence of LCP on functional outcome was evaluated based on the modified Mayo wrist score and the quality of reduction based on the Lindstrom criteria by observing volar tilt and radial inclination. ResultsFor radiological outcome, there was no variation in tilt/inclination of more than two degrees even after three months, which was a satisfactory result. Moreover, patients of all age groups showed early range of motion and functional benefit from LCP treatment. After six months of treatment, the patients experienced no pain and were able to return to their pre-injury jobs with little difficulty. Range of motion, work status, and grip strength after six months showed improvement of 15%, 7.8%, and 56%, respectively, compared to immediate postoperative assessments at three weeks. Although the end outcome with any treatment modality may yield similar results, when using LCPs, most patients experienced early functional improvement nearly six months after surgery. ConclusionsBy offering a lower risk of complications and early functional mobility, LCPs tend to restore the articular architecture of the fractured joint that results in the desired range of motion, grip strength, improved pain management, and functional status. Thus, LCPs appear to be a better alternative for distal end radial fractures than other treatment modalities.

No abstract