A better understanding of unsteady flow phenomena encountered in rotor-stator interactions is a key to further improvements in turbomachinery. Besides CFD methods yielding 3D flow field predictions, time-resolving measurement techniques are necessary to determine the instantaneous flow quantities of interest. Fast-response aerodynamic probes are a promising alternative to other time-resolving measurement techniques such as hot-wire anemometry or laser anemometry. This contribution gives an overview of the fast-response probe measurement technique, with the emphasis on the total system and its components, the development methods, the operation of such systems and the data processing requirements. A thorough optimization of all system components (such as sensor selection and packaging, probe tip construction, probe aerodynamics and data analysis) is the key of successful development. After description of the technique, examples of applications are given to illustrate its potential. Some remarks will refer to recent experiences gained by the development and application of the ETH FRAP ® system.

The present paper, Part 2 of a trilogy, is primarily focussed on demonstrating the capabilities of a fast-response aerodynamic probe system configuration based on the simplest type of fast-response probe. A single cylindrical probe equipped with a single pressure sensor is used to measure absolute pressure and both velocity components in an essentially two-dimensional flow field. The probe is used in the pseudo-three-sensor mode (see Part 1). It is demonstrated that such a one-sensor probe is able to measure high-frequency rotor-governed systematic fluctuations (like blade-to-blade phenomena) alone or in combination with flow-governed low-frequency fluctuations as rotating stall (RS) and mild surge (MS). However, three-sensor probes would be needed to measure stochastic (turbulence-related) or other aperiodic velocity transients. The data shown refer to the impeller exit and the vaned diffuser of a single-stage high-subsonic centrifugal compressor. Wall-to-wall probe traverses were performed at the impeller exit and different positions along the vaned diffuser for different running conditions. The centrifugal compressor was operated under stable as well as unstable (pulsating or stalled) running conditions. The turbomachinery-oriented interpretation of these unsteady flow data is a second focus of the paper. A refined analysis of the time-resolved data will be performed in Part 3, where different spatial/temporal averaging methods are compared. Two different averaging methods were used for the data evaluation: impeller-based ensemble-averaging for blade-to-blade systematic fluctuations (with constant period length at a constant shaft speed), and flow-based class averaging for the relatively slow MS and RS with slightly variable period length. Due to the ability of fast-response probes to simultaneously measure velocity components and total and static pressure, interesting insights can be obtained into impeller and diffuser channel flow structures as well as into the time behavior of such large-domain phenomena as RS and MS. [S0889-504X(00)01103-X]

The main goal of these investigations was the refined measurement of unsteady high-speed flow in a centrifugal compressor by using the advanced FRAP® fast-response aerodynamic probe system. The present contribution focusses on the impeller exit region and shows critical comparisons between fast-response (time-resolving) and conventional pneumatic probe measurement results. Three probes of identical external geometry (1 fast and 2 pneumatic) were used to perform wall-to-wall traverses close to the impeller exit. The data shown refer to a single running condition near the best point of the stage. The mass flow obtained from different probe measurements and from the standard orifice measurement were compared. Stage work obtained from temperature rise measured with a FRAP® probe and from impeller outlet velocity vectors fields by using Euler’s turbine equation are presented. The comparison in terms of velocity magnitude and angle distribution is quite satifactory, indicating the superior DC measurement capabilities of the fast-response probe system.

Ill I II I 111111111 HM I • ABSTRACTThis contribution gives an overview of the current state, performance and limitations of the fast-response aerodynamic probe measurement system (MAP* System) developed at the Turbomachinery Lab of the ETH Zurich. In particular, the following topics are addressed:Probe technology: Miniature probes with tip diameter ranging from 0.84 to 1.80 mm (1-sensor and 3-sensor probes respectively) have been developed. New technologies derived from microelectronics and micromechanics have been used to achieve an adequate packaging of the microsensor chips used. Both the sensor packaging and the sensor calibration (time-independent and time-dependent) are crucial issues for the DC accuracy of any measurement. Aerodynamic probe calibration:The methods used for the sensor calibration and the aerodynamic probe calibration, the pertinent automated test facilities and the processing of the output data are briefly presented. Since these miniature probes are also capable of measuring the mean flow temperature, aspects related to the recovery factor and the self-heating of the probe tip are treated and some recommendations related to sensor selection are given. Measurement system and data evaluation:The early measurement chain described in GOSSWEILER, KUPFERSCHMIED and GYARMATHY 1995 has evolved into the FRAF° System. This automatic system incorporates dedicated measurement concepts for a higher accuracy and a more efficient operation in terms of time and failures. An overview of the data evaluation process is given.The FRAP® System has been tested in real-sized turbomachines under industrial conditions within the temperature limits of I40°C imposed by the sensor technology (axial-flow turbofan compressor, axialflow turbine, centrifugal compressor). These applications confirmed the potential of the system and encouraged its further development. Now, the system is routinely used in the facilities of the Turbomachinery Lab and in occasional measurement campaigns in other laboratories.

The main goal of these investigations was the refined measurement of unsteady high-speed flow in a centrifugal compressor using the advanced FRAP® fast-response aerodynamic probe system. The present contribution focuses on the impeller exit region and shows critical comparisons between fast-response (time-resolving) and conventional pneumatic probe measurement results. Three probes of identical external geometry (one fast and two pneumatic) were used to perform wall-to-wall traverses close to the impeller exit. The data shown refer to a single running condition near the best point of the stage. The mass flow obtained from different probe measurements and from the standard orifice measurement were compared. Stage work obtained from temperature rise measured with a FRAP® probe and from impeller outlet velocity vectors fields by using Euler’s turbine equation are presented. The comparison in terms of velocity magnitude and angle distribution is quite satisfactory, indicating the superior DC measurement capabilities of the fast-response probe system.