ObjectivesThe predominance of extramuscular manifestations (e.g., skin rash, arthralgia, interstitial lung disease [ILD]) as well as the low frequency of muscle signs in anti–melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody–positive (anti-MDA5+) dermatomyositis caused us to question the term myositis-specific antibody for the anti-MDA5 antibody, as well as the homogeneity of the disease.MethodsTo characterize the anti-MDA5+ phenotype, an unsupervised analysis was performed on anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83/121) and compared to a group of patients with myositis without anti-MDA5 antibody (anti-MDA5−; n = 190/201) based on selected variables, collected retrospectively, without any missing data.ResultsWithin anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83), 3 subgroups were identified. One group (18.1%) corresponded to patients with a rapidly progressive ILD (93.3%; p < 0.0001 across all) and a very high mortality rate. The second subgroup (55.4%) corresponded to patients with pure dermato-rheumatologic symptoms (arthralgia; 82.6%; p < 0.01) and a good prognosis. The third corresponded to patients, mainly male (72.7%; p < 0.0001), with severe skin vasculopathy, frequent signs of myositis (proximal weakness: 68.2%; p < 0.0001), and an intermediate prognosis. Raynaud phenomenon, arthralgia/arthritis, and sex permit the cluster appurtenance (83.3% correct estimation). Nevertheless, an unsupervised analysis confirmed that anti-MDA5 antibody delineates an independent group of patients (e.g., dermatomyositis skin rash, skin ulcers, calcinosis, mechanic's hands, ILD, arthralgia/arthritis, and high mortality rate) distinct from anti-MDA5− patients with myositis.ConclusionAnti-MDA5+ patients have a systemic syndrome distinct from other patients with myositis. Three subgroups with different prognosis exist.

No abstract

BackgroundIn allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), prolonged nebulised antifungal treatment may be a strategy for maintaining remission.MethodsWe performed a randomised, single-blind, clinical trial in 30 centres. Patients with controlled ABPA after a 4-month attack treatment (corticosteroids and itraconazole) were randomly assigned to nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was occurrence of a first severe clinical exacerbation within 24 months following randomisation. Secondary outcomes included the median time-to-first severe clinical exacerbation, number of severe clinical exacerbations per patient, ABPA-related biological parameters.ResultsAmong 174 enrolled patients with ABPA from March 2015 through July 2017, 139 were controlled after 4-month attack treatment and were randomised. The primary outcome occurred in 33 (50.8%) of 65 patients in nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B group and 38 (51.3%) of 74 in placebo group (absolute difference −0.6%, 95% CI −16.8% to +15.6%, odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.90; p=0.95). The median time-to-first severe clinical exacerbation was longer in liposomal-amphotericin-B group, 337 days (IQR, 168 to 476) versus 177 (64 to 288). At the end of maintenance therapy, total immunoglobulin-E and Aspergillus precipitins were significantly decreased in nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B group.ConclusionsIn ABPA, maintenance therapy using nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B did not reduce the risk of severe clinical exacerbation. The presence of some positive secondary outcomes creates clinical equipoise for further research.

No abstract

No abstract