No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Conventional methods such as Ripper titration and aeration-oxidation (A-O) are widely used for the analysis of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) in wine. However, the free SO 2 reported by these procedures is overestimated due to dissociation of weakly bound SO 2 forms during the analysis, particularly from anthocyanin-bisulfite complexes. "Truly" free SO 2 in wine can be determined from the headspace SO 2 concentration of an equilibrated wine sample. A headspace SO 2 method based on gas detection tubes (HS-GDT) was recently described but is not readily automated. While solid phase microextraction (SPME) yielded poor precision in our experiments, our new method, based on static headspace gas chromatography and sulfur chemiluminescence detection (HS-GC-SCD), is readily automated and achieves high precision (<5%) and low limits of detection (0.033 mg/L molecular SO 2 , or ~1 mg/L free SO 2 in wine at pH 3.5). A-O, Ripper, HS-GC-SCD, and HS-GDT methods were compared on a diverse set of wine samples. Results from HS-GC were correlated with those from the HS-GDT method (r 2 = 0.92) and achieved higher precision (relative standard deviation = 3.7%). HS-GC was highly correlated with A-O in white wines (r 2 = 0.85, slope = 0.90) but had weaker correlation for red wines (r 2 = 0.71, slope = 0.44). The flexibility of GC for other procedures as well as its stability and low operating costs per sample make it an attractive option, and headspace methods have been shown to be better for predicting microbial stability in red wines.