The efficacy of licensed rotavirus vaccines has only been shown against certain rotavirus group A (RV-A) types. It is critical to understand the burden of rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) and its prevalent types to assess the potential impact of these vaccines in Latin America and the Caribbean (LA&C). We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of all the available evidence reported from 1990 to 2009 on the burden of rotavirus disease and strains circulating in LA&C. Eligible studies--185 country-level reports, 174 951 faecal samples--were selected from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, regional Ministries of Health, PAHO, regional proceedings, doctoral theses, reference lists of included studies and consulting experts. Arc-sine transformations and DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model were used for meta-analyses. The proportion of gastroenteritis cases due to rotavirus was 24.3% (95%CI 22.3-26.4) and the incidence of RVGE was 170 per 1000 children-years (95%CI 130-210). We estimated a global annual mortality for 22 countries of 88.2 (95%CI 79.3-97.1) deaths per 100 000 under 5 years (47 000 deaths).The most common G type detected was G1 (34.2%), followed by G9 (14.6%), and G2 (14.4%). The most common P types detected were P[8] (56.2%), P[4] (22.1%) and P[1] 5.4%, and the most prevalent P-G type associations were P[8]G1 17.9%, P[4]G2 9.1% and P[8]G9 8.8%. In the last 10 years, G9 circulation increased remarkably and G5 almost disappeared. More recently, G12 appeared and P[4]G2 re-emerged. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis of rotavirus infection and burden of disease in LA&C.

The burden of CAP was substantial, with S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. pneumoniae being the most common pathogens identified. High quality primary studies on disease incidence, use of health resources, and standardized data collection on disease burden and circulating strains are essential to provide baseline data for the future evaluation of vaccine impact.

Please cite this paper as: Savy et al. (2012) Burden of influenza in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses DOI: 10.1111/irv.12036. Objective  Influenza causes severe morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aimed to assess the incidence, etiology, and resource usage for influenza in Latin America and the Caribbean. Design  Meta‐analytic systematic review. Arcsine transformations and DerSimonian Laird random effects model were used for meta‐analyses. Setting  A literature search from 1980 to 2008 in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, Ministries of Health, PAHO, proceedings, reference lists, and consulting experts. Sample  We identified 1092 references, of which 31 were finally included, in addition to influenza surveillance reports. We also used information from the 10 reports from the collaborative group for epidemiological surveillance of influenza and other respiratory virus (GROG), and information retrieved from the WHO global flu database FLUNET. Main outcome measures  Incidence, percentage of influenza specimens out of the total received by influenza centers and resource‐use outcomes. Results  A total of 483 130 specimens of patients with influenza were analyzed. Meta‐analysis showed an annual rate of 36 080 (95%CI 28 550 43 610) influenza‐like illness per 100 000 persons‐years. The percentage of influenza out of total specimens received by influenza centers ranged between 4.66% and 15.42%, with type A the most prevalent, and A subtype H3 predominating. The mean length of stay at hospital due to influenza ranged between 5.8 12.9 days, total workdays lost due to influenza‐like illnesses were 17 150 days, and the mean direct cost of hospitalization was US$575 per laboratory‐confirmed influenza case. Conclusions  Our data show that seasonal influenza imposes a high morbidity and economic burden to the region. However, the vaccine‐uptake rate has been low in this region. Population‐based cohort studies are required to improve the knowledge about incidence and resource utilization, which would inform healthcare authorities for decision making.

Acinetobacter spp. (A. baumannii is the prevalent genomic species, but others may cause infection) has become an increasingly important cause of nosocomial pneumonia, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients (VAP). This organism has intrinsic resistance to some antimicrobials but easily acquires resistance to many others; Acinetobacter spp. can survive for long periods of time in the environment. All of these characteristics have contributed to protracted outbreaks associated with significant morbidity and mortality. High rates of colonization are found in debilitated hospitalized patients. Infecting or colonizing organisms in nosocomial infections are more likely to be from cross-transmission or from the hospital environment than from endogenous sources. VAP caused by Acinetobacter spp. is emerging as a prominent hospital complication. The incidence of this microorganism varies from site to site, but it is the second commonest aetiological agent among the gram-negative bacteria. Longer periods of hospitalization, longer time on mechanical ventilation and prior use of antibiotics are the recognized factors increasing the risk of VAP due to Acinetobacter spp. Treatment needs to clearly differentiate infection from colonization, and the agents with the most antimicrobial activity are imipenem/cilastatin, amikacin, colistin, ampicillin/sulbactam and tigecycline. Monotherapy can be adequate if the patient does not have significant comorbidities. Infection control procedures have a major role to play in preventing transmission of this microorganism. Emphasis on initial control measures should, however, be on strict isolation of infected or colonized patients to limit dissemination of outbreak strains in the environment. The variety of potential sources of contamination with Acinetobacter spp. in the hospital environment makes control of these outbreaks one of the more difficult challenges. Persistence of Acinetobacter spp. in the environment provides ample opportunities for contamination of patients and staff and may explain continuing long-term outbreaks.

No abstract