A significant number of clients utilizing mental health services will also be parents. Being a child of a parent with mental illness increases health risks for the child, and hospitalization of the parent has been identified as one of the most difficult times for children. However, few proactive measures have been taken to understand or provide for the needs of children visiting psychiatric inpatient facilities. The aim of this exploratory study was to identify the perspectives children, their parents, nominated carers, and clinicians from their experience of children visiting. The study used qualitative data gathered from interviews to develop an understanding of the issues. The purpose of this paper was to present the findings from parents, carers, and children. Children indicated that they wanted to visit and to remain involved with their parent, but that there was little support from staff. Families indicated that children visiting psychiatric inpatient facilities were not well managed, and they received little support about decisions around children visiting. The issue of children visiting psychiatric facilities when they have a parent who is an inpatient appears not to have been addressed in models of inpatient mental health care.

Children of parents with mental illness have been identified as a hidden population within mental health services, despite many clients being parents. In Australia, children of parents with a mental illness have been the focus of initiatives aimed at promoting their health and well-being and developing family-focused services. However, there has been little focus on children visiting acute inpatient mental health facilities. The aim of this study was to understand the experiences of children, their parents and carers, and staff when children visit, to better inform service planning. A qualitative exploratory research framework was used, and data were gathered through interviews. This paper presents the findings from the perspective of staff. Findings indicated that staff experienced being in a dilemma about children visiting and there were barriers to implementing family-friendly services. While staff mostly agreed in principle that children's visiting was beneficial, there was a lack of local policy and guidelines, and ad hoc arrangements existed. In addition, staff were unsure of their role with children, felt ill-equipped to talk to children about mental illness; and lacked knowledge of age-appropriate resources. Models of inpatient care need to be developed with a family focus that acknowledges the parental roles of clients and supports children visiting.

Income and education are better predictors of knowledge of the cervical cancer prevention process than rural residence. Higher rates of cervical cancer in rural areas may reflect lower educational attainment and lower income.

No abstract

No abstract