The sensitivity of antigen detection in disseminated histoplasmosis is higher in immunocompromised patients than in immunocompetent patients and in patients with more severe illness. The sensitivity for detection of antigenemia is similar to that for antigenuria in disseminated infection.

The second-generation Histoplasma antigen immunoassay is semiquantitative, expressing results as a comparison to a negative control, which requires repeat testing of the prior specimen with the current specimen to accurately determine a change in antigen. Reporting results in this manner often is confusing to the ordering physician and laboratory. Development of a quantitative assay could improve accuracy, reduce interassay variability, and eliminate the need to test the prior sample with the current sample in the same assay. Calibrators with known concentrations of Histoplasma antigen were used to quantitate antigen in specimens from patients with histoplasmosis and from controls. Samples from cases of disseminated histoplasmosis or other mycoses and controls were tested to evaluate the performance characteristics of the quantitative assay. Paired specimens were evaluated to determine if quantitation eliminated the need to test the current and prior specimens in the same assay to assess a change in antigen. The sensitivity in samples from patients with AIDS and disseminated histoplasmosis was 100% in urine and 92.3% in serum. Cross-reactions occurred in 70% of other endemic mycoses, but not in aspergillosis. Specificity was 99% in controls with community-acquired pneumonia, medical conditions in which histoplasmosis was excluded, or healthy subjects. A change in antigen level categorized as an increase, no change, or decrease based on antigen units determined in the same assay agreed closely with the category of change in nanograms/milliliter determined from testing current and prior specimens in different assays. Sensitivity, specificity, and interassay precision are excellent in the new third-generation quantitative Histoplasma antigen immunoassay.Antigen detection is a useful method for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis (8). Until now, antigen results have been expressed semiquantitatively as antigen units (calculated as enzyme immunoassay [EIA] units [EU]) based upon comparison to a negative control. Antigen levels decline with effective therapy (9, 12) and increase with relapse (13), providing a useful method for monitoring treatment. Based upon analysis of the course of antigen clearance during treatment of histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS (4, 6, 7), a Ն4-EU increase in antigen was chosen as evidence suggesting a relapse of histoplasmosis. In that evaluation, the change in antigen units between current and prior specimens tested concurrently rarely exceeded 4 EU in patients who did not relapse clinically (unpublished observation).Due to interassay variability, prior specimens have been tested simultaneously with current specimens to accurately assess changes in antigen levels. Test reports including current and prior results often are confusing, however, and do not always reach the ordering physician. In this report, a method for quantitation of Histoplasma capsulatum antigen is described, and its performance characteristics, including accuracy, specificity, sensitivity in patients with AIDS and dissemi...

We report results of an immunoassay for Blastomyces dermatitidis antigenuria. Sensitivity was 92.9%, and specificity was 79.3%. Cross-reactions occurred in 96.3% of patients with histoplasmosis, 100% of patients with paracoccidioidomycosis, 70% of patients with penicilliosis marneffei, 2.9% of patients with cryptococcosis, and 1.1% of patients with aspergillosis. Reproducibility was 96.3%. These findings support a potential role for antigen testing in blastomycosis.Most patients with blastomycosis exhibit progressive illnesses that require antifungal therapy. In one study, diagnosis was delayed for more than 1 month in nearly half of the cases (3). Blastomycosis was correctly suspected in only 20% of patients, resulting in unnecessary surgeries and treatment delays (7). In two-thirds of patients who died of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by blastomycosis, the diagnosis was either not suspected or considered only after the patient became moribund (10).At the University of Mississippi Medical Center, the first testing method for diagnosis was cytology in 58% of cases, KOH in 28% of cases, and histology in 12% of cases (8). The overall sensitivities were 93% for cytology, 85.1% for histology, 66.4% for culture, and 48.4% for KOH preparation. Pathologists who are less experienced with morphological

We evaluated cross-reactivity in the antigen assay used for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis by testing urine samples from patients with disseminated fungal infections. The mycoses chosen for this study were selected on the basis of the observation that during clinical testing, cross-reactions may occur between Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Penicillium marneffei. We detected antigen in 12 of 19 patients with blastomycosis, 8 of 9 with paracoccidioidomycois, in 17 of 18 with P. marneffei infection, and in one with disseminated H. capsulatum var. duboisii infection. Cross-reactions were not observed in the assays for six patients with disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Cross-reactivity between the agents of other endemic mycoses should be considered in interpreting a positive H. capsulatum var. capsulatum antigen assay. Antigen detection may provide a rapid, provisional diagnosis for patients with serious infections caused by one of these organisms.

These findings support careful monitoring for relapse in patients receiving voriconazole treatment for histoplasmosis, particularly in those who were previously treated with fluconazole.