Given the increasing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the need to synthesize new antimicrobials, silver has attracted interest in the scientific community because of its recognized antimicrobial activity. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles (NP) obtained by a new method and tested at concentrations of 6 μg/ml and 60 μg/ml against the species Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria innocua, Salmonella Choleraesuis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus cereus. The ability of these nanoparticles to remove or kill vegetative cells adhered to stainless steel surfaces was also evaluated. We observed that the NP obtained with the new method, concentrated silver nanoparticles (CNP), and silver nanoparticles with added sodium chloride (NPNaCl) had high antimicrobial activities (P < 0.05). We also verified that the most effective condition for the removal of P. aeruginosa cells on stainless steel coupons (10 by 10 mm) was immersion of the surfaces in CNP. The CNP treatment produced a 5-log reduction of the microbial population after 30 to 60 min of immersion. The CNP treatment also performed better than water and sodium carbonate, a compound commonly applied in clean-in-place procedures in the food industry, in removing adherent B. cereus cells from stainless steel cylinders. Therefore, these results suggest that NP synthesized by a new procedure may be used as antimicrobials in the food industry, for example, for the sanitization of utensils that come into contact with foods.
Polysulfone membranes (PSF) were modified with silver nanoparticles obtained by new synthesis (nAgNS), silver nanoparticles obtained commercially (nAgC), silver sulfadiazine (SP), dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DOTAB), benzalkonium chloride (CB) or sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (DBSS) to improve the efficiency of the water filtration process by reducing biofouling. All membranes had lower hydrophobicity compared with PSF. The zeta potentials of all membranes were negative at pH 7.0, except for CB 10%. In the agar diffusion test, E. coli was considered to be sensitive to the antimicrobial effect of the nAgNS 1%, 3%, 6%, 10% and DOTAB 10%, whereas S. aureus was sensitive to the nAgNS 1%, 3%, 6%, 10%, DOTAB 10%, CB 0.22%, 2% and 10%. The lowest adhesion of E. coli was found in the nAgNS 6% and 10%. In the evaluation of the loss of flow rate during filtration of the E. coli suspension and pure water, nAgNS showed higher flow rate values when compared with PSF. The nAgNS did not release quantities of silver (0.1 mg/l) above the amount considered safe by the World Health Organization. Membranes nAgNS 6% and 10% showed the best anti-biofouling characteristic.
Adhesion of Bacillus cereus A6 and L1, isolated from dairy plants, to stainless steel, granite, and glass surfaces was evaluated. Adhesion of B. cereus to all surfaces was affected by hydrophobicity. Adhesion to the hydrophobic surfaces (DG sws TOT < 0) of granite and stainless steel was greater than adhesion to glass, which was classified as a hydrophilic surface (DG sws TOT > 0). Bacillus cereus A6 adhered in higher numbers to all three surfaces evaluated and was less hydrophilic (DG bwb TOT = 19.83) than B. cereus L1 (DG bwb TOT = 23.50). For instance, in stainless steel the number of adhered cells of B.cereus A6 was 2.42 log CFU cm )2 while to B. cereus L1 was 1.96 log CFU cm )2 . The adhesion of B. cereus was thermodynamically favourable in granite and stainless steel surface (DG adhesion < 0). Therefore, the adherence process was affected by the strain of B. cereus and by the hydrophobicity of stainless steel, granite, glass and microorganisms surfaces.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.