The purpose of this commentary is threefold. First, to review the origins
and definitions of the concept of social capital as it has developed in the
recent literature. Second, to examine the limitations of this concept when
interpreted as a causal force able to transform communities and nations.
Third, to present several relevant examples from the recent empirical
literature on Latin American urbanisation and migration. These examples
point to the significance of social networks and community monitoring in
the viability of grass-roots economic initiatives and the simultaneous
difficulty of institutionalising such forces.Current interest in the concept of social capital in the field of national
development stems from the limitations of an exclusively economic
approach toward the achievement of the basic developmental goals:
sustained growth, equity, and democracy. The record of application of
neoliberal adjustment policies in less developed nations is decidedly
mixed, even when evaluated by strict economic criteria. Orthodox
adjustment policies have led to low inflation and sustained growth in some
countries, while in others they have failed spectacularly, leading to
currency crises, devaluations, and political instability. The ‘one-size-fits-
all’ package of economic policies foisted by the International Monetary
Fund and the US Treasury on countries at very different levels of
development have led to a series of contradictory outcomes that orthodox
economic theory itself is incapable of explaining.
A dialectical framework is proposed for analysing the economic and political practices associated with immigrant transnationalism. The causes and consequences of the transnational relations sustained by Salvadoran migrants in Los Angeles and Washington, DC, with El Salvador is used to test this proposition. It is argued that the conditions of Salvadorans' exit from their country of origin and of their reception in the US explains their tendency to invest considerable resources in forging and maintaining transnational relations with their places of origin. In turn, the aggregate impact of household-level transnational practices elicit spontaneous and institutional responses from different sectors of Salvadoran society. Based on the case of El Salvador, typologies of transnational economic enterprises and transnational political practices are presented that con rm the high degree to which the maintenance of transnational relations are indispensable to El Salvador and its migrant-citize ns.
This article explores the relationship between precarious employment and precarious migrant legal status. Original research on immigrant workers' employment experiences in Toronto examines the effects of several measures including human capital, network, labor market variables, and a change in legal status variable on job precarity as measured by an eight-indicator Index of Precarious Work (IPW). Precarious legal status has a long-lasting, negative effect on job precarity; both respondents who entered and remained in a precarious migratory status and those who shifted to secure status were more likely to remain in precarious work compared to respondents who entered with and remained in a secure status. This leaves no doubt that migrant-worker insecurity and vulnerability stem not only from having 'irregular' status. We introduce the notion of a work-citizenship matrix to capture the ways in which the precariousness of legal status and work intersect in the new economy. People and entire groups transition through intersecting work -citizenship insecurities, where prior locations have the potential to exert long-term effects, transitions continue to occur indefinitely over the life-course, and gains on one front are not always matched on others.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.