During early mammalian female development, one of the two X chromosomes becomes inactivated. Although X-chromosome coating by Xist RNA is essential for the initiation of X inactivation, little is known about how this signal is transformed into transcriptional silencing. Here we show that exclusion of RNA Polymerase II and transcription factors from the Xist RNA-coated X chromosome represents the earliest event following Xist RNA accumulation described so far in differentiating embryonic stem (ES) cells. Paradoxically, exclusion of the transcription machinery occurs before gene silencing is complete. However, examination of the three-dimensional organization of X-linked genes reveals that, when transcribed, they are always located at the periphery of, or outside, the Xist RNA domain, in contact with the transcription machinery. Upon silencing, genes shift to a more internal location, within the Xist RNA compartment devoid of transcription factors. Surprisingly, the appearance of this compartment is not dependent on the A-repeats of the Xist transcript, which are essential for gene silencing. However, the A-repeats are required for the relocation of genes into the Xist RNA silent domain. We propose that Xist RNA has multiple functions: A-repeat-independent creation of a transcriptionally silent nuclear compartment; and A-repeat-dependent induction of gene repression, which is associated with their translocation into this silent domain.[Keywords: X inactivation; Xist RNA; transcriptional silencing; 3D nuclear organization; histone modifications; differentiation] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.

At the time of fertilization, the paternal genome lacks the typical configuration and marks characteristic of pericentric heterochromatin. It is thus essential to understand the dynamics of this region during early development, its importance during that time period and how a somatic configuration is attained. Here, we show that pericentric satellites undergo a transient peak in expression precisely at the time of chromocenter formation. This transcription is regulated in a strand-specific manner in time and space and is strongly biased by the parental asymmetry. The transcriptional upregulation follows a developmental clock, yet when replication is blocked chromocenter formation is impeded. Furthermore, interference with major satellite transcripts using locked nucleic acid (LNA)-DNA gapmers results in developmental arrest before completion of chromocenter formation. We conclude that the exquisite strand-specific expression dynamics at major satellites during the 2-cell stage, with both up and downregulation, are necessary events for proper chromocenter organization and developmental progression.