SUMMARY Throughout the bacterial domain, the alarmone ppGpp dramatically reprograms transcription following nutrient limitation. This “stringent response” is critical for survival and antibiotic-tolerance and is a model for transcriptional regulation by small ligands. We report that ppGpp binds to two distinct sites 60 angstroms apart on E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), one characterized previously (Site 1) and a second identified here at an interface of RNAP and the transcription factor DksA (Site 2). The location and unusual tripartite nature of Site 2 account for the DksA-ppGpp synergism and suggest mechanisms for ppGpp enhancement of DksA’s effects on RNAP. Site 2 binding results in the majority of ppGpp’s effects on transcription initiation in vitro and in vivo, and strains lacking Site 2 are severely impaired for growth following nutritional shifts. Filling of the two sites at different ppGpp concentrations would expand the dynamic range of cellular responses to changes in ppGpp levels.

SUMMARY The global regulatory nucleotide ppGpp (“magic spot”) regulates transcription from a large subset of Escherichia coli promoters, illustrating how small molecules can control gene expression promoter-specifically by interacting with RNA polymerase (RNAP) without binding to DNA. However, ppGpp’s target site on RNAP, and therefore its mechanism of action, have remained unclear. We report here a binding site for ppGpp on E. coli RNAP, identified by crosslinking, protease mapping, and analysis of mutant RNAPs that fail to respond to ppGpp. A strain with a mutant ppGpp binding site displays properties characteristic of cells defective for ppGpp synthesis. The binding site is at an interface of two RNAP subunits, ω and β′, and its position suggests an allosteric mechanism of action involving restriction of motion between two mobile RNAP modules. Identification of the binding site allows prediction of bacterial species in which ppGpp exerts its effects by targeting RNAP.

The second messenger nucleotide ppGpp dramatically alters gene expression in bacteria to adjust cellular metabolism to nutrient availability. ppGpp binds to two sites on RNA polymerase (RNAP) inEscherichia coli, but it has also been reported to bind to many other proteins. To determine the role of the RNAP binding sites in the genome-wide effects of ppGpp on transcription, we used RNA-seq to analyze transcripts produced in response to elevated ppGpp levels in strains with/without the ppGpp binding sites on RNAP. We examined RNAs rapidly after ppGpp production without an accompanying nutrient starvation. This procedure enriched for direct effects of ppGpp on RNAP rather than for indirect effects on transcription resulting from starvation-induced changes in metabolism or on secondary events from the initial effects on RNAP. The transcriptional responses of all 757 genes identified after 5 minutes of ppGpp induction depended on ppGpp binding to RNAP. Most (>75%) were not reported in earlier studies. The regulated transcripts encode products involved not only in translation but also in many other cellular processes. In vitro transcription analysis of more than 100 promoters from the in vivo dataset identified a large collection of directly regulated promoters, unambiguously demonstrated that most effects of ppGpp on transcription in vivo were direct, and allowed comparison of DNA sequences from inhibited, activated, and unaffected promoter classes. Our analysis greatly expands our understanding of the breadth of the stringent response and suggests promoter sequence features that contribute to the specific effects of ppGpp.

The stringent response to nutrient deprivation is a stress response found throughout the bacterial domain of life. Although first described in proteobacteria for matching ribosome synthesis to the cell's translation status and for preventing formation of defective ribosomal particles, the response is actually much broader, regulating many hundreds of genes-some positively, some negatively. Utilization of the signaling molecules ppGpp and pppGpp for this purpose is ubiquitous in bacterial evolution, although the mechanisms employed vary. In proteobacteria, the signaling molecules typically bind to two sites on RNA polymerase, one at the interface of the β' and ω subunits and one at the interface of the β' secondary channel and the transcription factor DksA. The β' secondary channel is targeted by other transcription regulators as well. Although studies on the transcriptional outputs of the stringent response date back at least 50 years, the mechanisms responsible are only now coming into focus.

We show here that the promoters for many of the Escherichia coli ribosomal protein operons are regulated directly by two transcription factors, the small RNA polymerase-binding protein DksA and the nutritional stress-induced nucleotide ppGpp. ppGpp and DksA work together to inhibit transcription initiation from ribosomal protein promoters in vitro and in vivo. The degree of promoter regulation by ppGpp/DksA varies among the r-protein promoters, but some are inhibited almost as much as rRNA promoters. Thus, many r-protein operons are regulated at the level of transcription in addition to their control by the classic translational feedback systems discovered ∼30 y ago. We conclude that direct control of r-protein promoters and rRNA promoters by the same signal, ppGpp/DksA, makes a major contribution to the balanced and coordinated synthesis rates of all of the ribosomal components.ribosome synthesis | transcriptional control | stringent response | translational control P rotein synthesis is the major consumer of cellular energy in bacteria. Because the number of ribosomes is the primary determinant of the level of translation, and ribosome synthesis itself is an energy-intensive process, there are mechanisms that prevent over-or underinvestment of cellular resources in ribosome synthesis (1). Both ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and ribosomal protein (r-protein) synthesis rates are thereby tightly regulated in Escherichia coli (for reviews, see refs. 2, 3).One of the earliest reported examples of regulation of bacterial ribosome synthesis is a stress response referred to as "the stringent response," in which rRNA transcription is inhibited in cells starved for amino acids or some other nutrients (4). In this response, uncharged tRNAs induce the ribosome-associated RelA and/or SpoT proteins to synthesize ppGpp (5-7). [The term "ppGpp" is used here to describe both the unusual nucleotide guanosine-3′,5′-(bis)pyrophosphate and its pentaphosphate precursor.] ppGpp concentrations change not only after complete starvations but also after less severe shifts in nutritional conditions, coordinating rRNA synthesis with the need for protein synthesis. Shifts to a more favorable nutritional condition result in a decrease in the concentration of ppGpp and a corresponding increase in rRNA promoter activity, whereas shifts to a less favorable condition result in an increase in ppGpp and a corresponding decrease in rRNA transcription (8).ppGpp binds directly to E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) and inhibits transcription from rRNA promoters (9), although the identity of the ppGpp binding site on RNAP remains unclear (10). However, for ppGpp to exert its full effect on transcription, RNAP has to be modified by the small protein, DksA (11,12). Unlike ppGpp, DksA is present at high concentrations in cells under all conditions that have been examined (11,13). rRNA transcription initiation is also regulated by the concentration of the first nucleotide in the transcript (8,14) and by at least one DNA binding factor, the 11.2-kDa Fis protein (15). Tog...