BackgroundTreatment for bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women to reduce risk of spontaneous very preterm birth and late miscarriage remains controversial. We conducted a randomized control trial to determine whether bacterial vaginosis treatment could decrease spontaneous very preterm births and late miscarriages. MethodsThe PREMEVA trial was a multicenter randomized control double-blinded trial performed in 40 French centers. A total of 84,530 pregnant women were screened for bacterial vaginosis before 14 weeks of gestation. Women with bacterial vaginosis in the first trimester of pregnancy were randomly assigned to three similarly sized parallel arms: one four-day course of 600 mg oral clindamycin daily, three four-day courses of 600 mg daily a month apart or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of late miscarriage (16-21 weeks) or spontaneous very preterm delivery (22-32 weeks) according to clindamycin treatment or placebo. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous preterm delivery before 37 weeks (22-36 weeks). FindingsBetween 04/01/2006 and 06/30/2011, 84,530 pregnant women were screened before 14 weeks of gestation, 5630 (6•7%) had bacterial vaginosis and 2869 were randomized. The primary outcome did not differ significantly between the groups (1•2% in the clindamycin group and 1.0% in the placebo group, relative risk, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0•53 to 2•32), nor in the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery before 37 weeks (4•8% and 4•1%, respectively; relative risk, 1•17; 95% CI, 0•81 to 1•69). Side effects were more common in the clindamycin group (3•0% vs 1•3%, p=0•003) but not severe. InterpretationSystematic screening and subsequent treatment for bacterial vaginosis in low-risk pregnant women does not decrease late miscarriage, spontaneous very preterm birth, or spontaneous preterm birth.

Summary.In pregnant women with antecedents of autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP), no predictive factor for severe fetal thrombocytopenia has been identified. We evaluated the relationships between the course of the maternal disease before and during pregnancy and the risk of severe fetal thrombocytopenia, in 64 pregnant women with known chronic AITP antecedents, over a 12-year period. 28 pregnant women had undergone splenectomy before pregnancy and 17 experienced severe thrombocytopenia (< 50 × 10 9 /l) during pregnancy (monthly determination). Eight infants presented with severe thrombocytopenia at birth (12·5%), and four in the following days (6·25%). No severe haemorrhage was observed. Severe thrombocytopenia at birth was present in 57% (CI 95% 18-90%) of the infants born to mothers with severe pregnancy-associated thrombocytopenia and splenectomy antecedents, and in 0% (CI 95% 0-15%) of the infants born to mothers who presented none of these antecedents (P ¼ 0·001). In thrombocytopenic mothers the infant platelet counts at birth were positively correlated to the nadir maternal platelet count during the index pregnancy (r ¼ 0·42, P ¼ 0·0075).These results suggest that severe autoimmune disease is a risk factor for severe fetal thrombocytopenia, and that pregnant women with no antecedent of splenectomy nor severe thrombocytopenia during pregnancy have a very low risk of severe fetal thrombocytopenia.

; on behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Brain Tumor Group (BTG) Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases Committee and the EORTC BTG Imaging Committee

IntroductionAlthough prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for the control of invasive Candida infections and an improvement of prognosis, early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis remains a challenge and criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in ICU patients are poorly defined. Some scoring systems, such as the "Candida score" could help physicians to differentiate patients who could benefit from early antifungal treatment from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable. This study evaluated the performance of this score in a cohort of critically ill patients.MethodsA prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to March 2011 in five intensive care units in Nord-Pas de Calais, an area from North of France. All patients exhibiting, on ICU admission or during their ICU stay, a hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock could be included in this study. The data collected included patient characteristics on ICU admission and at the onset of severe sepsis or septic shock. The "Candida score" was calculated at the onset of sepsis or shock. The incidence of invasive candidiasis was determined and its relationship with the value of the "Candida score" was studied.ResultsNinety-four patients were studied. When severe sepsis or shock occurred, 44 patients had a score = 2, 29 patients had a score = 3, 17 patients had a score = 4, and 4 patients had a score = 5. Invasive candidiasis was observed in five (5.3%) patients. One patient had candidemia, three patients had peritonitis, and one patient had pleural infection. The rates of invasive candidiasis was 0% in patients with score = 2 or 3, 17.6% in patients with score = 4, and 50% in patients with score = 5 (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsOur results confirm that the "Candida score" is an interesting tool to differentiate among ICU patients who exhibit hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock those would benefit from early antifungal treatment (score > 3) from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable (score ≤ 3).

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text