The behavioral effects of repeated methylphenidate (MPH) treatment were assessed in young rats. In 4 experiments, rats (starting at Postnatal Day 10 or 16) were pretreated on 5 consecutive days with saline or MPH (2.5-20.0 mg/kg i.p.). Sensitization was assessed after 1 or 7 abstinence days, with rats receiving a test day challenge injection of either a low dose of MPH (2.5 mg/kg) or the same dose of MPH as given during pretreatment. Results show that a test day injection of 2.5 mg/kg MPH produced a sensitized locomotor response in rats pretreated with 2.5-20.0 mg/kg MPH. This MPH-induced locomotor sensitization was evident only after 1 abstinence day. Various pretreatment doses of MPH (5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg) were capable of sensitizing the stereotyped sniffing of young rats, but only rats pretreated and tested with the highest dose (20 mg/kg) of MPH showed an augmented stereotyped sniffing response that was still robust after 7 abstinence days. Results indicate that young rats are capable of exhibiting sensitization after an extended abstinence period, which contrasts with previous research suggesting that psychostimulant treatment does not produce long-term sensitization in young rats.

It appears that D(1)-like receptors are necessary for the development of amphetamine sensitization in wild-type mice, while neither the D(1A) nor D(1B) receptor subtypes are necessary for the amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization of D(1A)-deficient mice. A possible explanation for these conflicting results is that D(1A)-deficient mice may have a compensatory mechanism (not involving D(1B) receptors) that allows them to exhibit amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in the absence of the D(1A) receptor.

Repeatedly treating D(1)-deficient mice with AMPH appears to cause a general increase in responsivity. The reason for this hyper-responsivity is uncertain, but it is possible that cues from the testing environment were unable to inhibit responding (i.e., associative processes were disrupted). Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms (e.g., increases in D(2)-like receptors) may affect processes underlying sensitization and conditioned activity.

No abstract

No abstract