No abstract

No abstract

A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-and the proteins they are predicted to encode-was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.

Many metazoan cells can take up exogenous double-stranded (ds) RNA and use it to initiate an RNA silencing response, however, the mechanism for this uptake is ill-defined. Here, we identify the pathway for dsRNA uptake in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. Biochemical and cell biological analyses, and a genome-wide screen for components of the dsRNA-uptake machinery, indicated that dsRNA is taken up by an active process involving receptor-mediated endocytosis. Pharmacological inhibition of endocytic pathways disrupted exogenous dsRNA entry and the induction of gene silencing. This dsRNA uptake mechanism seems to be evolutionarily conserved, as knockdown of orthologues in Caenorhabditis elegans inactivated the RNA interference response in worms. Thus, this entry pathway is required for systemic RNA silencing in whole organisms. In Drosophila cells, pharmacological evidence suggests that dsRNA entry is mediated by pattern-recognition receptors. The possible role of these receptors in dsRNA entry may link RNA interference (RNAi) silencing to other innate immune responses.RNAi is a highly conserved dsRNA-guided mechanism that mediates sequence-specific gene silencing 1 . A number of animal cells can naturally take up exogenous dsRNA and use it to initiate RNAi silencing 2,3 . In some organisms, such as Drosophila, certain cells can efficiently take up dsRNA but seem to be unable to transmit this dsRNA to other cells in the body 4 . dsRNA uptake without further transmission to other cells has also been reported for some mammalian cell types [5][6][7] . Other organisms (such as C. elegans or juvenile grasshoppers) can both take up dsRNA and spread it systemically to elicit an RNAi response throughout the entire animal 8,9 . The mechanisms of uptake and spread of dsRNA are poorly understood. It is unclear whether dsRNA enters cells through passive, non-specific mechanisms, or whether there is an active mechanism that controls entry. Genetic analysis to identify genes involved in systemic spread of dsRNA in C. elegans isolated several mutants unable to distribute an ingested dsRNA signal from the gut throughout the body 8,10,11 . One of these, SID-1 (also known as RSD-8) is a putative transmembrane protein required for systemic spread 8 . When expressed ectopically in Drosophila cells, SID-1 enhanced the RNAi response observed at low dsRNA 5Correspondence should be addressed to R.A. (e-mail: Raul.Andino@UCSF.edu). 3 Current address: Canada Research Chair in Innate Immunity, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 4 These authors contributed equally to this work.Note: Supplementary Information is available on the Nature Cell Biology website. COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTSThe authors declare that they have no competing financial interests. concentrations 12 , raising the possibility that SID-1 may function as a channel on the cell surface for uptake of dsRNA. However, endogenous sid-1 homologues have not been found in the Drosophila genome, yet Drosophila S2 cells...

No abstract