Pharmacogenetic-based dosing was associated with a higher percentage of time in the therapeutic INR range than was standard dosing during the initiation of warfarin therapy. (Funded by the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01119300.).
SummaryOf 125 patients aged 65 years or over, with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin for at least 12 months, with a standard deviation (SD) of prothrombin time, expressed as the International Normalized Ratio (INR) >0AE5 over the previous 6 months, 40 were randomized to continue with usual clinic care and 85 to receive education about warfarin. Of these, 44 were randomized to self-monitor their INR and 41 returned to clinic. Compared with the previous 6 months there was a significant increase in percentage time within the therapeutic range for the 6 months following education [61AE1 vs. 70AE4; mean difference 8AE8; 95% confidence interval (CI): )0AE2-17AE8; P ¼ 0AE054] and following education and self-monitoring (57 vs. 71AE1; mean difference 14AE1; 95% CI: 6AE7-21AE5; P < 0AE001), compared with those patients following usual clinic care (60AE0 vs. 63AE2; mean difference 3AE2; 95% CI: )7AE3-13AE7). Using the same comparative periods, the INR SD fell by 0AE24 (P < 0AE0001) in the group allocated to education and self-monitoring, 0AE26 (P < 0AE0001) in the group receiving education alone and 0AE16 (P ¼ 0AE003) in the control group. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (intervention groups 0AE26 ± 0AE30 vs. control 0AE16 ± 0AE3, P ¼ 0AE10). Quality-of-life measurements and health beliefs about warfarin were unchanged (apart from emotional role limitation) with education or education and self-monitoring. Patient education regarding anticoagulation therapy could be a cost-effective initiative and is worthy of further study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.