Background This prospective multicenter study funded by the DEGUM assesses the diagnostic accuracy of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients.
Methods Patients at high risk for HCC with a histologically proven focal liver lesion on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively in a multicenter approach. Clinical and imaging data were entered via online entry forms. The diagnostic accuracies for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC were compared for the conventional interpretation of standardized CEUS at the time of the examination (= CEUS on-site) and the two CEUS algorithms ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) and CEUS LI-RADS (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System).
Results 321 patients were recruited in 43 centers; 299 (93.1 %) had liver cirrhosis. The diagnosis according to histology was HCC in 256 cases, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in 23 cases. In the subgroup of cirrhotic patients (n = 299), the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC was achieved with the CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (94.2 %) and CEUS on-site (90.9 %). The lowest sensitivity was reached with the CEUS LI-RADS algorithm (64 %; p < 0.001). However, the specificity of CEUS LI-RADS (78.9 %) was superior to that of ESCULAP (50.9 %) and CEUS on-site (64.9 %; p < 0.001). At the same time, the negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS LI-RADS was significantly inferior to that of ESCULAP (34.1 % vs. 67.4 %; p < 0.001) and CEUS on-site (62.7 %; p < 0.001). The positive predictive values of all modalities were high (around 90 %), with the best results seen for CEUS LI-RADS and CEUS on-site.
Conclusion This is the first multicenter, prospective comparison of standardized CEUS and the recently developed CEUS-based algorithms in histologically proven liver lesions in cirrhotic patients. Our results reaffirm the excellent diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients. However, on-site diagnosis by an experienced examiner achieves an almost equal diagnostic accuracy compared to CEUS-based diagnostic algorithms.
In injured patients, it has been shown that a polymorphism of the tumor necrosis factor-beta (TNFbeta) gene is related to the development of sepsis. We investigated the relation of TNFbeta gene polymorphism with the development of severe complications after elective major abdominal operations, and with production of TNFalpha perioperatively. In the present investigation, the Ncol polymorphism was studied in genomic DNA isolated from the blood of 172 patients. Preoperatively and postoperatively, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated production of TNFalpha in the patients' whole blood was tested in vitro. Genotypes and TNFalpha production were related to the occurrence of severe complications. Postoperatively, 15% (n = 26) of the patients developed severe complications. The overall mortality was 2% (n = 3). The homozygous TNFB2 genotype was found in 54% of the patients, the homozygous TNFB1 genotype was found in 14% of the patients, and the heterozygous genotype was found in 32% of the patients. In patients with complications, the B2B2 genotype was much more frequent (21/26, 81%) than in those without complications (72/146, 49%; P < 0.003). The development of complications was associated with a lower capacity to produce TNFalpha 3 and 7 days after the operation. In patients without complications, the TNFbeta polymorphism was not related to different levels of TNFalpha production. These data indicate an association between TNFbeta polymorphism and postoperative complications and they suggest the B2/B2 genotype as a high risk factor for the development of sepsis after elective operative trauma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.