Non-adherence to immunosuppressant medications (ISM) is a significant issue for transplant recipients. This study examines factors influencing ISM adherence in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Patient-reported data were collected through a cross-sectional survey including use of ISMs, adherence behaviors, perceived adherence barriers, beliefs and attitudes toward ISMs, and patient life satisfaction. Logistic regression was conducted to examine how RTRs' beliefs about use of ISMs, life satisfaction, and ISM adherence barriers were related to adherence. A total of 512 adult commercial insurance enrollees following renal transplantation were included in the analysis. One hundred and seventy-seven RTRs were non-adherent (34.5%); the most frequently cited reason was forgetfulness. RTRs aged 18-29 yr were more likely to be non-adherent than recipients 46-64 yr old (p ≤ 0.001). Non-adherent RTRs had greater adherence barriers than adherent RTRs (p < 0.001). Adherent RTRs believed their ISMs were more necessary than non-adherent RTRs (p < 0.001), while non-adherent RTRs had greater concerns about taking ISMs (p = 0.009) and believed they had less control over their lives than adherent RTRs (p < 0.001). Non-adherent RTRs had lower life satisfaction (p < 0.001). Non-adherence is significantly associated with patients' beliefs about ISMs, perceived barriers, and lower life satisfaction. Strategies to increase ISM adherence are discussed.

Background: Racial and ethnic minority groups have been disproportionately affected by the US coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, nationwide data on COVID-19 outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity and adjusted for clinical characteristics are sparse. This study analyzed the impacts of race/ethnicity on outcomes among US patients with COVID-19. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis in the electronic health record from 01 February 2020 through 14 September 2020. Index encounter site, hospitalization, and mortality were assessed by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [Black], non-Hispanic White [White], non-Hispanic Asian [Asian], or Other/unknown). Associations between racial/ethnic categories and study outcomes adjusted for patient characteristics were evaluated using logistic regression. Findings: Among 202,908 patients with confirmed COVID-19, patients from racial/ethnic minority groups were more likely than White patients to be hospitalized on initial presentation (Hispanic: adjusted odds ratio 1¢690, 95% CI 1¢620À1¢763; Black: 1¢810, 1¢743À1¢880; Asian: 1¢503, 1¢381À1¢636) and during follow-up (Hispanic: 1¢700, 1¢638À1¢764; Black: 1¢578, 1¢526À1¢633; Asian: 1¢391, 1¢288À1¢501). Among hospitalized patients, adjusted mortality risk was lower for Black patients (0¢881, 0¢809À0¢959) but higher for Asian patients (1¢205, 1¢000À1¢452). Interpretation: Racial/ethnic minority patients with COVID-19 had more severe disease on initial presentation than White patients. Increased mortality risk was attenuated by hospitalization among Black patients but not Asian patients, indicating that outcome disparities may be mediated by distinct factors for different groups. In addition to enacting policies to facilitate equitable access to COVID-19Àrelated care, further analyses of disaggregated population-level COVID-19 data are needed.

IRT substantially affected diabetes metrics and improved QoL among pediatric patients with T1D. Adolescents experienced a stronger treatment effect, but had difficulty in sustaining improved control after intervention cessation.

Physicians overestimate patient adherence to PMO therapies. Improving physician awareness of medication non-adherence to PMO therapies may facilitate physician-patient dialogue, with the aim of identifying patient-centered reasons for non-adherence. These discussions are important because patients with poorer adherence have a higher risk of fracture. Future research should focus on reasons for patient non-adherence to osteoporosis regimens and intervention strategies that improve communication between the provider and patient. Findings must be considered within the limitations of this claims database analysis. Some degree of incomplete or incorrect coding may exist, and the presence of a claim for a filled prescription does not indicate that the medication was consumed or taken as prescribed. Patients included in the study are not necessarily representative of all patients being treated for osteoporosis.

The results suggested that treatment with FDC AML/OM was associated with greater likelihood of adherence and lower overall costs than with FDC AML/BEN and LDC AML/ARB, and lower risk of cardiovascular event composite versus LDC AML/ARB.