Mitoxantrone is a dihydroxyanthracenedione derivative which as intravenous mono- and combination therapy has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy similar to that of standard induction and salvage treatment regimens in advanced breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia and chronic myelogenous leukaemia in blast crisis; it appears to be an effective alternative to the anthracycline component of standard treatment regimens in these indications. Mitoxantrone is also effective as a component of predominantly palliative treatment regimens for hepatic and advanced ovarian carcinoma. Limited studies suggest useful therapeutic activity in multiple myeloma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Regional therapy of malignant effusions, hepatic and ovarian carcinomas has also been very effective, with a reduction in systemic adverse effects. Mitoxantrone inhibits DNA synthesis by intercalating DNA, inducing DNA strand breaks, and causing DNA aggregation and compaction, and delays cell cycle progression, particularly in late S phase. In vitro antitumour activity is concentration- and exposure time-proportional, and synergy with other antineoplastic drugs has been demonstrated in murine tumour models. Leucopenia may be dose-limiting in patients with solid tumours, whereas stomatitis may be dose-limiting in patients with leukaemia. Other adverse effects are usually of mild or moderate severity although cardiac effects, particularly congestive heart failure, may be of concern, especially in patients with a history of anthracycline therapy, mediastinal irradiation or cardiovascular disease. Mitoxantrone displays an improved tolerability profile compared with doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, although myelosuppression may occur more frequently. Thus, mitoxantrone is an effective and better tolerated alternative to the anthracyclines in most haematological malignancies, in breast cancer and in advanced hepatic or ovarian carcinoma. Further studies may consolidate its role in the treatment of these and other malignancies.
The pyrophosphate analogue, foscarnet, selectively inhibits the DNA polymerase of human herpes viruses, including cytomegalovirus, and the reverse transcriptase of HIV. Viral replication is therefore prevented, but resumes when the drug is cleared from infected cells. In vitro, the combination of foscarnet and zidovudine (azidothymidine) has an additive effect against cytomegalovirus and acts synergistically against HIV. An improvement in cytomegalovirus retinitis is obtained in over 85% of affected AIDS patients during foscarnet induction therapy, but relapse usually occurs within a month of ceasing treatment. There is a similar duration of remission during maintenance therapy given for 5 days each week, but this can be extended 4- to 5-fold with daily administration of higher doses. In allograft recipients, progression of retinitis can be halted by foscarnet until immune function recovers and eradicates the virus. The incidence of acute renal failure, which is common during foscarnet therapy, may be reduced by dosage adjustment and adequate prehydration. Anaemia, phlebitis, nausea and vomiting, and disturbances in serum calcium and phosphate levels, perhaps resulting from uptake of foscarnet into bone or chelation with ionised calcium, have also been associated with administration of the drug. Cytomegalovirus retinitis is difficult to treat, with few therapeutic options available. Although treatment with foscarnet produces some severe adverse effects, with care these can be minimised, and the drug produces clinical improvement in a large proportion of patients; this is a highly encouraging finding at this stage in its development. Preliminary comparative data indicate that foscarnet and ganciclovir are similarly effective, but foscarnet may have some theoretical advantages in AIDS patients since it can be used in combination with zidovudine without potentiating myelosuppression.
Lamotrigine is an antiepileptic drug which is believed to suppress seizures by inhibiting the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Efficacy has been demonstrated for lamotrigine as add-on therapy to existing regimens in patients with resistant partial seizures. Total seizure frequency was reduced by 17 to 59% compared with placebo, and 13 to 67% of patients experienced reductions of > or = 50% in seizure frequency. Secondarily generalised tonic-clonic seizures respond well to lamotrigine, and there is preliminary evidence of improvement in patients with primary generalised seizures, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and in children with multiple seizure types. Seizure control has been maintained in patients who have continued to receive lamotrigine as monotherapy after discontinuation of other medications. Results of one trial suggest similar efficacy for lamotrigine monotherapy as for carbamazepine, but confirmation of its use in this setting awaits more extensive controlled comparisons with established agents. Adverse events associated with lamotrigine as add-on therapy are typical of antiepileptic drugs, namely dizziness, ataxia and other CNS-related symptoms. Rash, which has occurred in 10% of patients in placebo-controlled trials, may be severe and its appearance has led to discontinuation of therapy in 1% of patients. Lamotrigine appears well tolerated in the longer term, but this facet of its profile requires further monitoring. Influences of valproic acid and enzyme-inducing anti-epileptics on lamotrigine eliminate necessitate dosage modification of lamotrigine. Conversely, lamotrigine has little apparent influence on the pharmacokinetics of other agents, although it may increase plasma concentrations of the active metabolite of carbamazepine during concomitant administration. Thus, lamotrigine permits improved seizure control in some patients with refractory partial seizures, and may prove to be especially effective in secondarily generalised tonic-clonic seizures. As is usual at this stage in a drug's development, several aspects of the profile of lamotrigine are incompletely defined, notably its efficacy in other seizure types, in children, as monotherapy, and its longer term tolerability. Nonetheless, lamotrigine presently offers a worthwhile alternative for the physician confronted with the challenge of treating patients with intractable partial seizures with or without secondarily generalised seizures, and shows potential for broader applications in other areas of epilepsy management.
Goserelin is a synthetic analogue of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH); or gonadorelin] which stimulates gonadotrophin and sex hormone release in the short term, and then causes suppression with continued administration. Goserelin is given as a subcutaneous biodegradable depot incorporating 3.6 mg of the drug, which is released continuously at an average rate of 120 micrograms/day over 4 weeks. Monthly goserelin depot therapy produces partial disease remission or stabilisation in about 75% of men with previously untreated prostatic cancer, a rate equivalent to that achieved with orchidectomy or diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol). The response to goserelin is more rapid than to diethylstilbestrol, and goserelin is better tolerated. About 30 to 45% of premenopausal women with breast cancer responded to goserelin using objective assessment criteria, suggesting comparability to ovariectomy. In benign hormone-dependent conditions, preoperative goserelin aids surgical removal of uterine leiomyoma (fibroids) and reduces blood loss, and 6 months of therapy relieves the signs and symptoms of endometriosis. The elevation in testosterone at the beginning of goserelin therapy can result in disease 'flare' in men with prostate cancer, and sex steroid suppression with continued treatment results in hot flushes and loss of libido in most patients. Thus, goserelin is an effective alternative to surgery or estrogen therapy in prostatic cancer palliation, and possibly to ovariectomy in premenopausal breast cancer. Other gynaecological conditions reliant on the pituitary-gonadal axis also appear amenable to hormone manipulation with goserelin.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.