No abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates if relative flexion or extension of the ulnohumeral joint affects the strength of repair in olecranon fractures treated with a precontoured locking plate. Methods: A cadaveric study was performed in matched pair cadaveric elbows. All soft tissue was dissected from the radius, ulna, and elbow of each specimen, leaving interosseous ligaments and joint capsules intact. Soft tissue from the humerus was dissected away, leaving only the triceps tendon and ulnar insertions intact. An oblique proximal to distal olecranon osteotomy was created in each specimen 1 cm from the tip of the olecranon. Internal fixation with standard precontoured locking plates and a Krackow augmentation suture with #2 FiberWire followed. Specimens were randomized to elbow position of 90 or 20 degrees° and loaded to failure via axial pull through the triceps. Load at failure, displacement at the time of failure, peak load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure was recorded and compared. The study was repeated a second time with the osteotomy more proximal, 0.6 cm creating a smaller fragment with less opportunities for locking screw fixation. This small fragment group was then tested as the large fragment group had. Results: There were no significant differences in load at failure, peak load, or stiffness between the elbow position in the large fragment group. Displacement at time of failure was significantly different, although not clinically relevant. Failure of fixation in this group was a mix of triceps avulsion and failure through fracture site. The smaller fragment group with less points of fixation demonstrated no statistically significant differences in any parameters. A majority of the failures were at the fracture site. Conclusions: Ulnohumeral position does not significantly affect overall construct strength even in olecranon fractures with small proximal fragments with limited points of fixation.

No abstract

Background: Surgical repair of clavicle fractures is being employed more frequently, although most fractures are still treated conservatively. Both can result in nonunion. Current treatments for clavicle nonunion include open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) plating without bone graft, ORIF plating with bone graft, and intramedullary pin fixation.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting outcome, complication, and reoperation rates following surgical treatment for clavicle nonunion. Subgroup analysis was undertaken for outcome and complication rates between single plating and intramedullary pin fixation, bone graft use, and nonunion time length definition.Results: Fifty-three studies met inclusion criteria (1,258 clavicle nonunions). Mean clinical follow-up was 2.6 years. Seventy-two percent of nonunions were of the middle third, 1% were proximal third, 12% were distal third, and 15% were not reported. Forty-eight percent of nonunions were atrophic or oligotrophic and 17% were hypertrophic (35% not reported). Mean time to union was 13.6 weeks. Ninety-five percent of patients achieved union after the primary nonunion surgery. Overall complication rate was 17%. Singleplating fixation had significantly faster union time (15.2 vs. 19.8 weeks), lower reoperation rate (23% vs. 37%), and hardware removal rate (20% vs. 34%) than intramedullary pin fixation. Bone graft had significantly lower rates of delayed union (0.6% vs. 3.6%) but higher complication (15% vs. 8%) and reoperation rates (29% vs. 14%) than the other groups. Studies that defined nonunion after 3 months had significantly faster union times than the 6-month studies (13 vs. 16 weeks). The 3-month group had a significantly lower overall complication rate (12% vs. 25%) and hardware/fixation failure rate (3% vs. 5.5%) than the 6-month group.

There are limited studies in the literature regarding the reconstruction of bilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in a single-stage setting. However, there have been no published studies describing simultaneous revision reconstructions of previously reconstructed bilateral ACLs. We present the case of a 37-year-old male who underwent previous reconstruction of both ACLs at an outside hospital and presented to our outpatient clinic with instability and pain. Simultaneous bilateral ACL revision reconstruction was performed with the use of tibialis anterior allografts. This case report suggests that single-stage bilateral ACL revision reconstruction is a safe procedure that can provide good results for the patient.