Introduction Understanding the purchaser–provider split model in the patient pathway is important. The purchaser is a key player in managing the flow between specialist and municipal healthcare services. A smoother patient transfer has been a priority in Norway, but also challenging. Accordingly, this study aims to describe and explain how the purchasers operate as liaisons during patient transfers from specialist to primary healthcare services. Methods Eleven interviews were conducted with employees at purchaser units in primary healthcare in Norway. The interviewees’ professional backgrounds were in nursing and physiotherapy, as well as casework, and management. The interviews took place in 2018–2019 and analyzed with Graneheim and Lundman's content analysis strategy. Results The interviewees’ views reflected the changes they experienced in the wake of healthcare reforms in specialist healthcare services and municipal healthcare institutions. Three themes emerged from the analyses: (1) increased efficiency requirements after the Coordination Reform, (2) better reporting systems and the need for role clarifications in contact with hospitals, and (3) the need for good assessments for safe transfer to the municipality. Discussion Purchaser unit employees’ experiences with patient pathways point towards a need for certain changes. There is a need for increased efficiency requirements for purchasing units, even with new electronic tools, as well as a growing need for better reporting systems and a common understanding between the service levels about what patients can expect in the municipalities.
Hensikten med denne studien er å belyse informasjonsflyt i overføring av pasient fra spesialisthelsetjenesten til kommunale helsetjenester, gjennom å fortolke erfaringer fra saksbehandlere i forvaltningsnivået TK. Studien er basert på kvalitative intervjuer med 11 informanter. Dataanalysen er inspirert av Granheim og Lundmans kvalitative innholdsanalyse. Tre temaer ble identifisert; 1. ulike perspektiver i rapportering, 2. frustrasjon og kontroll og 3. gjensidighet i samhandling. Temaene diskuteres i lys av informasjonskvalitet, konsekvenser av ulike perspektivvalg, gjensidighet og anerkjennelse. Studien finner et tydelig behov for anerkjennelse av perspektiv, ansvar og kompetanse hos TK ansatte, samt et ønske om formell dialog rundt utfordringene.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.