No abstract

No abstract

Classification Association Rule Mining (CARM) systems operate by applying an Association Rule Mining (ARM) method to obtain classification rules from a training set of previously classified data. The rules thus generated will be influenced by the choice of ARM parameters employed by the algorithm (typically support and confidence threshold values). In this paper we examine the effect that this choice has on the predictive accuracy of CARM methods. We show that the accuracy can almost always be improved by a suitable choice of parameters, and describe a hill-climbing method for finding the best parameter settings. We also demonstrate that the proposed hill-climbing method is most effective when coupled with a fast CARM algorithm such as the TFPC algorithm which is also described.

Abstract. One application of Association Rule Mining (ARM) is to identify Classification Association Rules (CARs) that can be used to classify future instances from the same population as the data being mined. Most CARM methods first mine the data for candidate rules, then prune these using coverage analysis of the training data. In this paper we describe a CARM algorithm that avoids the need for coverage analysis, and a technique for tuning its threshold parameters to obtain more accurate classification. We present results to show this approach can achieve better accuracy than comparable alternatives at lower cost.

In this paper a number of Classification