Protein adhesion plays a major role in determining the biocompatibility of materials. The first stage of implant integration is the adhesion of protein followed by cell attachment. Surface modification of implants (surface chemistry and topography) to induce and control protein and cell adhesion is currently of great interest. This communication presents data on protein adsorption (bovine serum albumin and fibrinogen) onto model hydrophobic (CH(3)) and hydrophilic (OH) surfaces, investigated using a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and grazing angle infrared spectroscopy. Our data suggest that albumin undergoes adsorption via a single step whereas fibrinogen adsorption is a more complex, multistage process. Albumin has a stronger affinity toward the CH(3) compared to OH terminated surface. In contrast, fibrinogen adheres more rapidly to both surfaces, having a slightly higher affinity toward the hydrophobic surface. Conformational assessment of the adsorbed proteins by grazing angle infrared spectroscopy (GA-FTIR) shows that after an initial 1 h incubation few further time-dependent changes are observed. Both proteins exhibited a less organized secondary structure upon adsorption onto a hydrophobic surface than onto a hydrophilic surface, with the effect observed greatest for albumin. This study demonstrates the ability of simple tailor-made monochemical surfaces to influence binding rates and conformation of bound proteins through protein-surface interactions. Current interest in biocompatible materials has focused on surface modifications to induce rapid healing, both of implants and for wound care products. This effect may also be of significance at the next stage of implant integration, as cell adhesion occurs through the surface protein layer.

No abstract

Protein adsorption behavior is at the heart of many of today's research fields including biotechnology and materials science. With understanding of protein-surface interactions, control over the conformation and orientation of immobilized species may ultimately allow tailor-made surfaces to be generated. In this contribution protein-surface interactions have been examined with particular focus on surface curvature with and without surface chemistry effects. Silica spheres with diameters in the range 15-165 nm with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surface chemistries have been used as model substrates. Two proteins differing in size and shape, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and bovine fibrinogen (Fg), have been used in model studies of protein binding with detailed secondary structure analysis being performed using infrared spectroscopy (IR) on surface-bound proteins. Although trends in binding affinity and saturation values were similar for both proteins, albumin is increasingly less ordered on larger substrates, while fibrinogen, in contrast, loses secondary structure to a greater extent when adsorbing onto particles with high surface curvature. These effects are compounded by surface chemistry, with both proteins becoming more denatured on hydrophobic surfaces. Both surface chemistry and topography play key roles in determining the structure of the bound proteins. A model of the binding characteristics of these two proteins onto surfaces having differing curvature and chemistry is presented. We propose that properties of an adsorbed protein layer may be guided through careful consideration of surface structure, allowing the fabrication of materials/surface coatings with tailored bioactivity.

This review concerns the importance of length and time on physicochemical interactions between living tissue and biomaterials that occur on implantation. The review provides information on material host interactions, materials for medical applications and cell surface interactions, and then details the extent of knowledge concerning the role(s) that surface chemistry and topography play during the first stage of implant integration, namely protein adsorption. The key points are illustrated by data from model in vitro studies. Host implant interactions begin nanoseconds after first contact and from then on are in a state of flux due to protein adsorption, cell adhesion and physical and chemical alteration of the implanted material. The many questions concerning the conformational form and control of bound proteins and how this may impact on cell adhesion in the first instance and later on cell signalling and implant integration can be answered by systematic investigations using model materials. Only then we will be in a more informed position to design new materials for use in the body.

No abstract