No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective Pediatric neuropsychological evaluations are intended to support children in their development and ability to function successfully in their everyday settings; however, limited efforts have been made to synthesize the available literature regarding the utility of these evaluations. To improve the impact of pediatric neuropsychological evaluations, a systematic review was conducted to identify components of the assessment and feedback process that are associated with parents’ perception of helpfulness (help parent understand child), usefulness (provide actionable information/elicit change) and overall parent satisfaction. Data Selection We followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify research on parental perception of the utility of pediatric neuropsychological evaluations for children aged 3–21 years. We searched PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases using the terms “neuropsychology,” “pediatric,” “neuropsychological evaluation,” “neurodevelopmental disorders,” “perceived utility,” and “parental utility.” Data Synthesis We identified 1,029 abstracts and after full review included 9 articles in our qualitative synthesis. Conclusions Parents generally reported high levels of satisfaction with their child’s evaluation. The research has also suggested that parents find evaluations and feedback helpful for understanding their child’s pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Recommendations from the neuropsychologists provided useful information for obtaining support and eliciting change. Limitations of the studies reviewed included small sample size, variability in methods, and reduced generalizability of results.

No abstract