This paper describes an improved method for performing statistical comparisons among experimental groups. This technique, termed multi-response permutation procedures (MRPP), is similar in purpose to the t test and one-way analysis of variance F test. However, in contrast to these, the new method features very relaxed requirements on the data structure, is easily applied to multivariate problems, and makes it possible to relate the analysis visually to the perceived data space. The MRPP test statistic is based on the within-group average of pairwise distance measures between object response values in a euclidian data space. The null distribution of the test statistic is based on the collection of all possible permutations of the objects into groups having specified sizes. For large group sizes, this distribution is approximated by a continuous distribution satisfYing three exact moments.The advantages and applications of MRPP are illustrated using both artificial examples and empirical data on total August standing crop in mixed prairie following an October wildfire. The MRPP analyses of the empirical data revealed that there were no differences in standing crop between burned and unburned areas after the first postfire growing season, but that after two growing seasons, standing crop was significantly greater in the previously burned areas.
Abstract. Soil samples were randomly collected from 422 vegetable gardens in a study area centered in downtown Baltimore, Maryland, and having a radius of 48.28 km (30 miles). The levels of lead, four other metals (cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc), and pH were measured for each location. The application of multi-response permutation procedures, which are compatible with mapping techniques, reveals that lead (as well as cadmium, copper, nickel, and
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.