Health care‐associated infections (HAIs) are a major clinical and economic problem in Australian hospitals, and a significant proportion are preventable. HAIs are the result of complex environmental, microbiological, pathological, behavioural and organisational factors, and prevention requires a multifaceted (“bundled”) approach, including appropriate policies, educational programs for health care workers, and adequate resources to implement them effectively. Failure to protect patients from avoidable harm, including HAIs, has significant ethical implications; it often reflects both organisational systems failure and non‐compliance of health care workers with evidence‐based policies, including hand hygiene. If implemented with appropriate safeguards, infection control “bundles” that include sanctions for poor compliance with hand hygiene and other infection control policies, will achieve sustained improvements where previous approaches have failed.
Seasonal influenza imposes an enormous but poorly defined burden of excess deaths, hospital admissions, and health-care costs, and often spreads within health-care facilities. Hospital patients with influenza are a potential source of infection for health-care workers that are not immunised, with attack rates among health-care workers of 18–24%.1 Unfortunately, health-care workers infected with influenza often continue to work, despite symptoms, with potentially devastating consequences for high-risk patients, including those who are very young, elderly, or immunocompromised—for example, patients receiving bone-marrow transplants have a high risk of pneumonia and death from influenza.2\ud Trivalent subunit influenza vaccines are 70–90% effective3 and safe, with mild side-effects in less than 10% of recipients.4 Immunisation of health-care workers can reduce exposure to, and illness and death from, influenza among patients in long-term care facilities5 even with modest uptake rates6 (at an estimated cost of £51–405 per life-year saved), as well as reducing infection and absenteeism among health-care workers that have been immunised (with estimated savings of £12 per vaccinee).5 In a bone-marrow-transplant unit in the USA, increasing immunisation uptake from 12% to 58% among health-care workers, was associated with a reduction in nosocomial influenza infections from 14 to 4 cases per 10 000 patients days.7\ud Despite this evidence and recommendations by major health authorities for yearly immunisation of health-care workers,8 uptake is often poor (less than 30%). Immunisation uptake rarely exceeds 60%, even when vaccine is free and easily accessible,5 and 9 which is inadequate to protect the most vulnerable patients, many of whom are unimmunised because of immunosuppression or comorbidities. Uptake can be increased by various interventions, including staff education, active promotion, incentives, declination forms, clinical leadership, and provision of free vaccine at convenient locations, such as mobile carts,8 and 10 but increases are often modest and difficult to sustain over successive seasonsveli
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.