Objective: Urine cultures have poor specificity for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). We evaluated the effect of a urine-culture stewardship program on urine culture utilization and CAUTI in adult intensive care units (ICUs). Design: A quasi-interventional study was performed from 2015 to 2017. Setting and patients: The study cohort comprised 21,367 patients admitted to the ICU at a teaching hospital. Intervention: The urine culture stewardship program included monthly 1-hour discussions with ICU house staff emphasizing avoidance of “pan-culture” for sepsis workup and obtaining urine culture only if a urinary source of sepsis is suspected. The urine culture utilization rate metric (UCUR; ie, no. urine cultueres/catheter days ×100) was utilized to measure the effect. Monthly UCUR, catheter utilization ratio (CUR), and CAUTI rate were reported on an interactive quality dashboard. To ensure safety, catheterized ICU patients (2015–2016) were evaluated for 30-day readmission for UTI. Time-series data and relationships were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficients and regression analysis. Results: Urine culture utilization decreased from 3,081 in 2015 to 2,158 in 2016 to 1,218 in 2017. CAUTIs decreased from 78 in 2015 to 60 in 2016 and 28 in 2017. Regression analysis over time showed significant decreases in UCUR (r, 0.917; P < .0001) and CAUTI rate (r, 0.657; P < .0001). The co-correlation between UCUR and CAUTI rate was (r, 0.625; P < .0001) compared to CUR and CAUTI rate (r, 0.523; P = .004). None of these patients was readmitted with a CAUTI. Conclusions: Urine culture stewardship program was effective and safe in reducing UC overutilization and was correlated with a decrease in CAUTIs. Addition of urine-culture stewardship to standard best practices could reduce CAUTI in ICUs.
Background Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most commonly reported healthcare associated infections (HAI) reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). However, asymptomatic bacteriuria is common in patients with indwelling urinary catheters (IUC), and inappropriate culturing leads to overdiagnosis in colonized patients, unnecessary antibiotics and increased resistance. We evaluated the effectiveness of an electronic medical record (EMR) “hard stop” in reducing inappropriate urine cultures (UC) and its impact on CAUTI rates. Methods This was a pre-post quasi-experimental retrospective study comparing CAUTI rate per 1000 catheter days, UC order rate per 1000 patient days, Standardized Utilization Ratio (SUR) and Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) in the pre-intervention period (January 2019-December 2020) to the intervention period (April 2021-March 2022) in Southeast Michigan. In March 2021, we implemented a hard stop in Epic® that fired 24 hours after admission in patients with IUC >1 calendar day and until 4 days after IUC removal. The Medical Director of Infection Prevention and Control had the ability to override the hard stop when indicated after reviewing the case upon provider request; education was provided in real-time. We prospectively monitored outcomes, including pyelonephritis and/or bacteremia within 3 days and readmission for sepsis within 30 days in patients UC was deemed unnecessary. Results CAUTI rate was 0.52 in the pre-intervention period and 0.09 in the post-intervention period, an 83% reduction (Figure 1). Rate of UC performed was 0.283 in the pre-intervention period and 0.218 in the post-intervention period, a 23% reduction. SUR decreased from 0.809 to 0.716, an 11% reduction (95% CI, 0.875-0.894, p< 0.001). SIR decreased from 0.392 to 0.135, a 66% reduction (95% CI, 0.154-0.0689, p=0.0015). Post-intervention, there were 44 override requests that were denied with no adverse patient outcomes. Conclusion Urine culture stewardship, utilizing an electronic hard stop, was effective in reducing inappropriate UC orders, SIR and SUR in patients with IUC without causing patient harm. This strategy combined with real-time education can significantly reduce CAUTI rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.