No abstract

Much of the work done by perioperative nurses focuses on patient safety. Perioperative nurses are aware that unreported near misses occur every day, and they use that knowledge to prioritize activities to protect the patient. The purpose of this study was to identify the highest priority patient safety issues reported by perioperative RNs. We sent a link to an anonymous electronic survey to all AORN members who had e-mail addresses in AORN's member database. The survey asked respondents to identify top perioperative patient safety issues. We received 3,137 usable responses and identified the 10 highest priority safety issues, including wrong site/procedure/patient surgery, retained surgical items, medication errors, failures in instrument reprocessing, pressure injuries, specimen management errors, surgical fires, perioperative hypothermia, burns from energy devices, and difficult intubation/airway emergencies. Differences were found among practice settings. The information from this study can be used to inform the development of educational programs and the allocation of resources to enhance safe perioperative patient care.

Recognition of the importance of early diagnosis and aggressive, definitive surgical intervention has brought about a dramatic decline in mortality related to distal esophageal perforation. In the following retrospective analysis, we have examined all cases of thoracic esophageal perforations diagnosed, consulted, and/or treated by one author (PDK) at the Inova Fairfax Hospital from June 1, 1988 through March 17, 2005. These cases consisted of 48 patients (34 male) with a mean age of 59.4 years (range, 20-92). Among 25 patients with early diagnosis (< or = 24 h), hospital survival was 92%, increasing to 96% when early diagnosis was combined with surgical treatment. Among the 23 patients with late diagnosis (> 24 h), hospital survival was 82.6%, increasing to 92.3% when treated with surgery. We recommend aggressive, definitive surgery for thoracic esophageal perforations, regardless of time of diagnosis. In the absence of phlegmon or implacable obstruction, primary repair offers excellent results with the shortest length of stay. Resection and reconstruction are the best choices in circumstances where significant phlegmon or distal obstruction render primary repair hazardous or inapplicable. Diversion, preferably with proximal and distal esophageal exclusion, may be necessary for patients too ill to undergo more formidable surgery. Conservative, medical therapy may be appropriate in patients with 'microperforations' with no continuing leak. Finally, comfort measures alone may be appropriate where circumstances merit no effort at resuscitation.

We recommend aggressive, definitive surgery for thoracic esophageal perforations, whether diagnosed early or late. A variety of options are discussed with regard to complicated presentations.