Subclinical rejection may be associated with decreased graft function after renal transplantation (Tx). Detection by protocol biopsies and treatment could thus be important for the long-term prognosis. We have earlier discovered that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declined in young children during the first 18 months. Consequently, we slightly enhanced and individualized each patient's immunosuppression. This was a retrospective study of 59 pediatric renal Tx patients between 1995 and 2001. The 35 historical controls received triple-therapy of azathioprine, methylprednisolone and cyclosporine. GFR was measured by protocol at discharge, 6 and 18 months, and a core biopsy was obtained at 18 months. The 24 study patients in addition received basiliximab, had GFR measured at 3 and 12 months, and a biopsy taken at 3 months. Based on histology and function, immunosuppression was individually adjusted. The groups were compared for GFR and histology at 18 months after Tx. There were less acute rejection episodes in the study group (0.38 vs. 1.23 per patient) and serum creatinine concentrations were lower. Subclinical rejection was detected and treated in 39% at 3 months. There were more chronic changes in the control (47%) than in the study group (29%) at 18 months. GFR was significantly higher in the study group at 18 months (87 vs. 68 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), most remarkably in patients < or =2 yr of age (99 vs. 68 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Detection of subclinical rejection and slightly enhanced and individualized immunosuppression improved GFR 18 months after renal Tx, especially in the youngest patients.
AIMSCiclosporin A (CsA) dosing in immunosuppression after paediatric kidney transplantation remains challenging, and appropriate target CsA exposures (AUCs) are controversial. This study aimed to develop a time-to-first-acute rejection (AR) model and to explore predictive factors for therapy outcome. METHODSPatient records at the Children's Hospital in Helsinki, Finland, were analysed. A parametric survival model in NONMEM was used to describe the time to first AR. The influences of AUC and other covariates were explored using stepwise covariate modelling, bootstrap-stepwise covariate modelling and cross-validated stepwise covariate modelling. The clinical relevance of the effects was assessed with the time at which 90% of the patients were AR free (t90). RESULTSData from 87 patients (0.7-19.8 years old, 54 experiencing an AR) were analysed. The baseline hazard was described with a function changing in steps over time. No statistically significant covariate effects were identified, a finding substantiated by all methods used. Thus, within the observed AUC range (90% interval 1.13-8.40 h mg l -1 ), a rise in AUC was not found to increase protection from AR. Dialysis time, sex and baseline weight were potential covariates, but the predicted clinical relevance of their effects was low. For the strongest covariate, dialysis time, median t90 was 5.8 days (90% confidence interval 5.1-6.8) for long dialysis times (90th percentile) and 7.4 days (6.4-11.7) for short dialysis times (10th percentile). CONCLUSIONSA survival model with discrete time-varying hazards described the data. Within the observed range, AUC was not identified as a covariate. This feedback on clinical practice may help to avoid unnecessarily high CsA dosing in children.
Glucocorticoid (GC) dosing is commonly based on body mass or surface area in children, although the drug effects appear to correlate with steroid exposure, rather than dose. We compared the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of methylprednisolone (MP) with a recombinant cell bioassay measuring serum glucocorticoid bioactivity (GBA), in prediction of side effects in 16 pediatric patients (5.4-18.4 years of age) 2.0-14.9 years after renal transplantation (TX). They received 0.3 mg/kg of MP orally and timed blood samples were drawn up to 8 h postdose. Serum MP concentrations correlated moderately with GBA (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001) with best linear fit at 6 and 8 h (r = 0.72, 0.79, respectively, p < 0.001). MP-AUC t=0-8 and GBA t=6 were significantly greater in patients who gained excessive weight soon after TX. Change in growth after TX was inversely correlated with MP-AUC (r = 0.73, p < 0.05) and GBA t=6 (r = 0.62, p < 0.05). No correlation of MP-AUC or GBA was found with blood glucose or serum lipid concentrations, glomerular filtration rate, bone mineral density or graft histology. In conclusion, GC exposure varies individually and dosing should be adjusted accordingly to control the adverse effects. GBA might provide a complementary tool for monitoring GC exposure but further studies are needed.
Cyclosporine A (CsA) dose-interval pharmacokinetic profiles, performed 1-4 years post-transplantation, were collected from 74 renal transplanted children. Forty patients were on three times daily dosing (t.i.d.) and 34 on twice daily dosing (b.i.d.). Regression models for prediction of area under the curve (AUC) using 1-3 concentration time points as independent variables were developed. With similar weight-adjusted single doses (mg kg(-1)) of CsA, t.i.d. dosing resulted in a trough-concentration (C0) similar to that from b.i.d. dosing, but a 30% lower 2 h post-dose concentration (C2). For b.i.d. dosing the relationship between C0 and AUC was poor (r2=0.23) and the prediction error was large (5.8+/-33.5%). For t.i.d. dosing the relationship was better (r2=0.79), but prediction error was still large (4.5+/-24.9%). For C2 relationships were similar to those for the b.i.d. (r2=0.59) and t.i.d. (r2=0.63) groups, but explained modestly the variations of AUC (prediction error=2.6+/-16.8% b.i.d., 4.8+/-23.2% t.i.d.). Both C0 and C2 are useful monitoring methods when CsA is administered t.i.d. If the aim is similar specified daily drug exposure, the target C2 should be roughly 30% smaller in t.i.d. dosing than in b.i.d. dosing and the target C0 could be similar. The prediction error of AUC can be large in individual patients when using single time-point determinations, however. The use of multiple time points reduces the variation, but is less feasible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.