Several metallopeptidases have been reported to be involved in bradykinin (BK) B 1 receptor agonist metabolism. Our goal was to evaluate in vitro roles of metallopeptidases [e.g., neutral endopeptidase (NEP), aminopeptidase M (APM), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)] as functional inactivators of the selective BKB 1 receptor agonist Lys-des-Arg 9 -BK (DAKD) in isolated human umbilical artery (HUA) rings. Concentrationresponse curves (CRCs) to DAKD were performed after a 5-h incubation period. Treatment with 10 M phosphoramidon (NEP inhibitor) or 10 M amastatin (APM inhibitor) potentiated DAKD-elicited responses, whereas 1 M captopril (ACE inhibitor) had no significant effects. However, when the three enzymes were simultaneously inhibited, a significant potentiation over responses obtained under concurrent NEP and aminopeptidase M inhibition was observed. In contrast, responses induced by the peptidase resistant BKB 1 receptor agonist Sar-D-Phe 8 -des-Arg 9 -BK were not modified by triple peptidase inhibition. In addition, endothelial denudation failed to alter DAKD-induced responses in HUA. Finally, in the presence of NEP, ACE, and APM inhibition, Lys-des-Arg 9 -[Leu 8 ]-BK, the potent BKB 1 receptor antagonist, produced a parallel, concentration-dependent, rightward shift of DAKD CRCs. The obtained pK B (8.57) and the Schild slope not different from unity are in agreement with an interaction at a single homogeneous BKB 1 receptor population. In summary, this work constitutes the first pharmacological evidence that metallopeptidases NEP, APM, and ACE represent a relevant inactivation mechanism of the endogenous BKB 1 receptor agonist DAKD in isolated HUA.
This study attempted to characterize pharmacologically the involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptors in 5-HT-induced contractile responses in human umbilical vein (HUV) rings employing functional and radioligand binding assays. In HUV rings, prazosin 1 micro M did not affect contractile responses elicited by 5-HT, ruling out the involvement of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in contractile responses to 5-HT. 5-HT-induced contractions were competitively blocked by ketanserin, a 5-HT(2A)-selective antagonist. The apparent pA(2) value was 9.8 and the Schild slope significantly less than unity, suggesting that 5-HT-induced responses are mediated by a heterogeneous receptor population. Alpha-methyl-5-HT, a selective 5-HT(2) receptor agonist, induced contractions that were antagonized in a competitive manner by ketanserin. The slope regression was not significantly different from unity and the pA(2) value was 8.8. The selective 5-HT(2A) ligand spiperone produced a parallel rightward shift on 5-HT CRCs in HUV rings. The calculated pA(2) was 9.0, which is in accord for an interaction with the 5-HT(2A) receptor subtype. Alpha-methyl-5-HT CRCs were competitively blocked by spiperone treatment. The Schild analysis yielded a pA(2) of 9.1 with a slope not significantly different from unity. The 5-HT(2C/2A) antagonist mesulergine 10 nM did not affect 5-HT CRCs, suggesting that 5-HT(2C) receptors are not involved in 5-HT-elicited contractions. Higher concentrations of mesulergine showed a parallel rightward shift on 5-HT responses. The calculated pA(2) was 7.44, which suggests an interaction with the 5-HT(2A) receptor subtype. In addition, mesulergine competitively blocked alpha-methyl-5-HT CRCs. The Schild slope was not significantly different from unity and the p A(2) value was 7.98. The binding of [(3)H]ketanserin to HUV membranes was saturable and of high affinity. Ketanserin displayed a monophasic curve which was best fit with a single component of binding. Nonlinear least squares analysis of the binding curves revealed a high affinity K(d) of 0.30 nM and a B(max) of 134 fmol/mg protein. These findings provide strong pharmacological evidence of the involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptors in 5-HT-induced vasoconstriction in HUV. In addition, the contribution of another receptor population cannot be excluded. The results also suggest that this receptor population is neither an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor nor a 5-HT(2C) receptor subtype.
Previous studies have shown that a heterogeneous 5-HT receptor population may be involved in vasoconstrictor actions of 5-HT in human umbilical vein (HUV). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor subtype mediates contraction in this tissue. 5-HT(1B/1D)-mediated responses can be enhanced or unmasked after exposure to threshold or sub-threshold KCl concentrations. In HUV rings, when 5-HT, alpha-Me-5HT or bradykinin concentration-response curves (CRC) were generated in the presence or absence of sub-threshold concentrations of KCl, there were not significant differences between the control and the treated rings. On the other hand, sumatriptan, the classic selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist, produced a concentration-related contraction that was potentiated in the presence of sub-threshold KCl concentration. In addition, L-694,247, the novel selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist, displayed a concentration-dependent contraction with high potency in HUV. The presence of sub-threshold concentrations of KCl produced a marked leftward shift of its CRCs.GR-55562, a 5-HT(1B/1D)-selective antagonist, competitively blocked sumatriptan CRCs with an estimated p A(2) of 8.00 and a slope not different from unity. Likewise, SB-216641, a selective 5-HT(1B) antagonist, produced a parallel rightward shift of sumatriptan CRCs in HUV. The Schild analysis yielded a p A(2) of 9.29, with a slope not different from unity. In addition, L-694,247 contractile responses were competitively blocked by SB-216641 with an estimated p A(2) value of 9.12 and a Schild slope not different from unity. On the other hand, ketanserin behaved as a weak antagonist of L-694,247-induced responses, yielding a calculated p A(2) value of 6.40. In summary, the results obtained in this study support that the 5-HT(1B) receptor subtype is involved in vasoconstrictor responses in HUV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.