Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women, and most breast cancer related deaths are due to metastasis. Urinary bladder metastasis from breast cancer is rarely reported in the literature. In this review, we examined the reported cases of breast cancer metastasizing to the urinary bladder, with the objective of identifying clues that could help physicians in diagnosing and planning further treatment. We performed a systematic review of the literature to analyze the clinical and pathological profile of this disease. We thoroughly examined and systematically reported data regarding epidemiology, the pattern of spread, signs and symptoms, pathology and hormonal status, diagnostic workup, management, and outcomes. Urinary bladder metastases from breast cancers are more common in invasive lobular carcinoma. In addition to asymptomatic presentations, most cases present with hematuria and voiding dysfunction. This review summarizes the insights into the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, management, and prognosis of urinary bladder metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

The lymph node ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of the number of positive lymph nodes to the total number of nodes retrieved. LNR has recently emerged as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The objective of our study was to pool eligible studies to elucidate the prognostic role of LNR on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in rectal cancer patients using a meta-analysis. Methods A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE and Embase for relevant studies that reported LNR in rectal cancer. Two authors independently screened the relevant articles for selection and data extraction. As a result, a list of such studies and references, published in English up to December 2019, was obtained, and a total of 4,486 node-positive patients in 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. RevMan software 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, the Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen) was used for conducting all statistical analyses. Results A higher LNR was significantly correlated with worse OS [hazard ratio (HR): 2.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.21-3.06; p≤.00001] and DFS (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 2.11-2.80; p≤.00001) in node-positive rectal cancer patients. Besides, LNR is an independent predictive and prognostic marker of OS and DFS (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 2.17-2.94; p≤.00001 with I 2 =0%; p=.32 and HR: 2.63; 95% CI: 2.17-3.18; p≤.00001 with I 2 =0%; p=.63 respectively, irrespective of lymph nodal harvest). Conclusions Our present study demonstrates that LNR is an independent predictor of survival in rectal cancer. LNR should be considered as a parameter in future oncological staging systems. Further well-designed randomized control trials to prospectively assess LNR as an independent predictor of rectal cancer survival are necessary before its application in daily practice.

Introduction Tumor budding is defined as a cluster of cells that invade the stroma. This has recently been studied to be associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) and poor overall survival (OS) rate. The reliability and reproducibility of this histopathological feature make it a valid prognostic indicator in tongue carcinomas, which often have an unpredictable prognosis. The objective of this study was to group the studies that elucidate the prognostic role of tumor budding in tongue cancers. Methods A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant studies that reported tumor budding in tongue cancer. The relevant articles were independently screened by two authors for selection and data extraction. As a result, a list of such studies, clinical trials, and references, published in English up to March 2020, was obtained, and a total of 1448 patients in nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Results A higher tumor budding score was significantly correlated with LNM (hazard ratio (HR): 3.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.08-4.52; p≤.00001) and poor OS (HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.84-3.14; p≤.00001) in tongue cancer. Conclusions Our present study demonstrates that tumor budding is an independent predictor of LNM and OS in tongue cancer. Tumor budding should be considered a parameter in future oncological staging systems.

Introduction Mean platelet volume (MPV) is an inflammatory marker suggesting the activation of platelets. Many studies observed an association between MPV and cancer spread and metastasis. Hence, we have conducted a retrospective study to find the role of MPV as a prognostic marker in locally advanced gastric cancer. Materials and methods The present study included a retrospective review of 149 patients with gastric cancer who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. MPV was obtained and then statistically analyzed to find an association between tumor (T), node (N), and overall stage as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results In our study, we observed that MPV values were significantly high in N+ disease (OR 3.794 (95% CI 1.903-7.563); p-value 0.0001), higher T stage (OR for >T2 3.692 (95% CI 1.876-7.266); pvalue 0.0001), and advanced stage (OR 7.708 (95% CI 3.258-18.237); p-value 0.0001) of gastric cancer. Conclusions MPV is an inflammatory marker that correlates with nodal disease and aids in the staging and prognostication of locally advanced gastric cancer. This inexpensive, convenient marker can aid in the risk stratification of locally advanced gastric cancer.

The lymph node ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of number of positive lymph nodes to the total number of lymph nodes harvested during surgery. The objective of this article is to investigate the efficacy of LNR as a prognostic indicator of survival in pancreatic cancer patients who have undergone surgery by meta-analysis. Methods A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant studies that reported LNR in pancreatic cancer. Two authors independently screened the relevant articles for selection and to extract data. All studies published in English up to April 2020 were obtained, and a total of 17,128 node-positive patients in 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis. RevMan software 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, the Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used for conducting all statistical analyses. Results This meta-analysis demonstrated that LNR > 0.2 significantly correlated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.74-1.94; p ≤ 0.00001) in node-positive pancreatic cancer patients. Conclusions Our findings have demonstrated that a higher LNR is a predictor of poor survival and that LNR serves as an independent prognostic marker for assessing survival using a cutoff of 20%.