Objective
To analyze outcomes and risk factors of cardiovascular events in a metropolitan COVID-19 database, and to perform a subgroup analysis in African American populations to determine whether outcomes and risk factors are influenced by race.
Design
Retrospective cohort analysis from March 9, 2020 to June 20, 2020.
Setting
Population-based study in Louisville, KY, USA
Participants
700 adult inpatients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Interventions
N/A
Measurements and Main
Results: Our cohort consisted of 126 patients (18%) with cardiovascular events and 574 patients without cardiovascular events. Patients with cardiovascular events had a much higher mortality rate than those without cardiovascular events (45.2% vs. 8.7%,
p
<0.001). There was no difference between African Americans and Whites regarding mortality (43.9% vs 46.3%,
p
=1) and length of stay for survivors (11 days vs. 9.5 days,
p
=0.301). Multiple logistics regression analysis suggested that male, race, lower SaO2/FiO2, higher serum potassium, lower serum albumin, and number of cardiovascular co-morbidities were highly associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events in COVID-19 patients. Lower serum albumin and neoplastic/immune compromised diseases were highly associated with cardiovascular events for African American COVID-19 patients. SaO2/FiO2 ratio and cardiovascular comorbidity count were significantly associated with cardiovascular events in white patients.
Conclusions
: Cardiovascular events were prevalent and associated with worse outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Outcomes of cardiovascular events in African American and white COVID-19 patients were similar after propensity score matching analysis. There were common and unique risk factors for cardiovascular events in African American COVID-19 patients when compared with white patients.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Rhabdomyolysis is caused by extensive damage to skeletal muscles resulting in elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), leading to life-threatening consequences like acute renal failure, cardiac arrhythmias, and hyperthermia. A variety of causes for muscle damage are known, and one of the most common is drug-induced. Statins and many other agents are known to induce muscle damage, but here we report Entresto™ (Sacubitril/Valsartan) induced rhabdomyolysis which has not been previously reported as solely responsible in the literature.
The limited availability of biological samples from patients testing positive for SARS CoV-2 to be available for future research was quickly identified at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to this need, a COVID-19 biobank was initiated by the University of Louisville Division of Infectious Diseases, Center of Excellence for Research in Infectious Diseases (CERID). The COVID-19 biobank contains waste samples obtained from patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in any of the nine Louisville, Kentucky area hospitals during the timeframe of April 13, 2020 through 09-20-2020. The COVID-19 biobank stores approximately1,623 waste samples with 2,127 aliquots for distribution. All samples are linked to clinical data. The methods described in this paper are intended for use as a guide for other research institutions interested in developing a COVID-19 biobank.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.