No abstract

The purpose of this study was to test, whether the late phase of remote ischaemic preconditioning (L-RIPC) improves myocardial protection in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cold-crystalloid cardioplegia and whether preoperative tramadol modifies myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury using the same group of patients in a single-blinded randomized controlled study. One hundred and one adult patients were randomly assigned to either the L-RIPC, control or tramadol group. L-RIPC consisted of three five-minute cycles of upper limb ischaemia and three five-minute pauses using blood pressure cuff inflation 18 hours prior to the operation. Patients in the tramadol group received 200 mg tramadol retard at 19:00 hours, the day before the operation and at 06:00 hours. Serum troponin I levels were measured at eight, 16 and 24 hours after surgery. Myocardial samples for inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthases (iNOS, eNOS) estimation were drawn twice: before and after cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass from the auricle of the right atrium. We found that L-RIPC can reduce injury beyond the myocardial protection provided by cold-crystalloid cardioplegia, and tramadol worsened myocardial injury after CABG. Expressions of iNOS were increased in the control (significantly) and L-RIPC groups and dampened in the tramadol group.

Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe vascular disease associated with major morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of AD requires the performance of urgent aortic imaging exams such as computed tomography angiography, but the decision to perform these exams now essentially relies on clinical judgment. Several studies have identified a range of potential biomarkers stemming from the aortic extracellular matrix (matrix metalloproteinases, TGF-β, soluble elastin fragments), vascular smooth muscle cells (smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, creatine kinase, calponin), coagulation (D-dimer, platelets) and inflammation (C-reactive protein), whose circulating levels increase in patients affected by AD. Biomarkers of AD could be potentially used to screen patients with compatible symptoms, to identify patients at higher risk of AD, to rule out AD in patients with non-high clinical probability of AD and/or to obtain prognostic stratification of affected patients. This review will summarize available data and discuss present and future perspectives of circulating biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of AD.