In our opinion, the presented technique is probably the least invasive and the most complete technique of VATS thymectomy with excellent cosmetic results and is a valid alternative to sternotomy approach for the Masaoka Stage I-III thymomas.
The presence of OM in the mediastinal LNs was associated with decreased total and disease-free survival rates in stages I and II NSCLC patients. Immunohistochemical staining of mediastinal LNs obtained preoperatively improved the accuracy of staging and allowed for the identification of patients with a poorer prognosis.
Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become an accepted method for the treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard VATS approach is an intercostal one which is often followed by postoperative pain due to injury of the intercostal nerve. The non-intercostal techniques of VATS include the subxiphoid, transcervical, transdiaphragmatic and transoral procedures. Methods: The technical difficulty of operative management of the anatomical structures during VATS anatomical resection are compared for the intercostal, subxiphoid and transcervical approaches. Results: Some operative steps have different range of difficulty, which are analyzed in detail. Conclusions: The clearest advantages of the non-intercostal approaches include less postoperative pain and superradial bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy in case of the transcervical approach. However, the non-intercostal approaches are more technically demanding procedures, which therapeutic role has to be clarified in the future.
Background
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate long-term survival of stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients operated after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and negative mediastinal restaging with transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA).
Methods
From January 2007 to December 2013, 48 stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (36 men, 12 women) underwent anatomic pulmonary resection after induction therapy and negative result of mediastinal restaging with TEMLA. Mean age was 58.3 years (range, 46–75 years). There were 28 squamous cell carcinomas, 13 adenocarcinomas, 1 mixed carcinoma and 6 non-small cell lung cancers. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in 24 patients, chemoradiotherapy in 23 and chemotherapy with bradytherapy in 1 patient. All patients were followed-up until death or 60 months since pulmonary resection.
Results
There were 29 pneumonectomies, 2 lower bilobectomies and 17 lobectomies. 2 patients had R1 resection. After negative TEMLA, persistent metastatic N2 nodes were discovered in 5 patients (10.4%). The only complication after TEMLA was bilateral vocal cord paralysis observed in 1 patient (2.1%); 2 patients died in early postoperative period due to bronchial fistula (4.2%). Overall 5-year survival of patients operated after negative TEMLA was 39.5%. 5-year survival was not statistically different in patients who underwent lobectomy/bilobectomy and in patients who underwent pneumonectomy (47.4%
vs
. 34.5%). Five-year survival was lower in patients after chemoradiotherapy than in patients after chemotherapy alone (21.7%
vs
. 56.0%, P=0.022). 5-year survival was not statistically different in patients with true mediastinal downstaging and in patients with false negative TEMLA (41.9%
vs
. 20%, P=0.19).
Conclusions
Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent pulmonary resection after induction treatment and negative mediastinal restaging with TEMLA showed good long-term survival. In these patients aggressive surgery, including pneumonectomy, lead to satisfactory outcomes. However, prognosis of patients after induction chemoradiotherapy was worse.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.