Purpose:The objective of this study is to analyse the appropriateness of lower extremity coputed tomography (CT) scans as performed in a large orthopaedic hospital. Material and methods:A total of 1410 CT scans acquired in the years 2014-2018 were analysed for compliance with the "Guidelines for Physicians Issuing Diagnostic Imaging Referrals" (iRefer). These guidelines were published by the Royal Radiologist Society and recommended for use by the Polish Medical Society of Radiology, the National Consultant for Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, and the Minister of Health. In addition, the study involved the analysis of information provided on CT referrals by referring clinicians.Results: Nearly 21% of CT referrals were found to be unsubstantiated based on the diagnosis made by the referring physician, the body region of interest, and the clinical department. Most referrals identified as non-compliant with the guidelines were related to cancers followed by inflammatory conditions. The lowest number of unjustified exams was reported for endoprostheses and injury-related cases. Conclusions:The study revealed a significant degree of non-compliance with the diagnostic algorithm as defined in the iRefer guidelines, particularly in cases of cancers and inflammatory conditions. Consequently, the patient's exposure to ionizing radiation is increased. Incorrect decisions regarding the appropriate diagnostic imaging technique are founded on the lack of appropriate cooperation between the clinician and the radiologist, insufficiency or lack of information provided on the referral, as well as the defensive attitude of referring physicians. It is therefore necessary to change appropriate in-hospital management and cooperation models.

Aims The aim of the study was to compare two methods of calculating pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT), either by using the femoral heads or acetabular domes to determine the bicoxofemoral axis, in patients with unilateral or bilateral primary hip osteoarthritis (OA). Methods PI and PT were measured on standing lateral radiographs of the spine in two groups: 50 patients with unilateral (Group I) and 50 patients with bilateral hip OA (Group II), using the femoral heads or acetabular domes to define the bicoxofemoral axis. Agreement between the methods was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEm). The intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the two methods were analyzed on 31 radiographs in both groups to calculate ICC and SEm. Results In both groups, excellent agreement between the two methods was obtained, with ICC of 0.99 and SEm 0.3° for Group I, and ICC 0.99 and SEm 0.4° for Group II. The intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for both methods in both groups, with an ICC of at least 0.97 and SEm not exceeding 0.8°. The study also revealed excellent interobserver reliability for both methods in both groups, with ICC 0.99 and SEm 0.5° or less. Conclusion Either the femoral heads or acetabular domes can be used to define the bicoxofemoral axis on the lateral standing radiographs of the spine for measuring PI and PT in patients with idiopathic unilateral or bilateral hip OA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1345–1350.

Streszczenie nie jest dostępne.