The molecular pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is poorly understood. Whole-genome and exome sequencing followed by innovative tumorgraft analyses (to accurately determine mutant allele ratios) identified several putative two-hit tumor suppressor genes including BAP1. BAP1, a nuclear deubiquitinase, is inactivated in 15% of clear-cell RCCs. BAP1 cofractionates with and binds to HCF-1 in tumorgrafts. Mutations disrupting the HCF-1 binding motif impair BAP1-mediated suppression of cell proliferation, but not H2AK119ub1 deubiquitination. BAP1 loss sensitizes RCC cells in vitro to genotoxic stress. Interestingly, BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations anticorrelate in tumors (P=3×10−5), and combined loss of BAP1 and PBRM1 in a few RCCs was associated with rhabdoid features (q=0.0007). BAP1 and PBRM1 regulate seemingly different gene expression programs, and BAP1 loss was associated with high tumor grade (q=0.0005). Our results establish the foundation for an integrated pathological and molecular genetic classification of RCC, paving the way for subtype-specific treatments exploiting genetic vulnerabilities.
Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) is characterized by VHL inactivation1,2. Because no other gene is mutated as frequently, and VHL mutations are truncal3, VHL inactivation is regarded as the governing event4. VHL loss activates HIF-2, and constitutive HIF-2 restores tumorigenesis in VHL-reconstituted ccRCC cells5. HIF-2 is implicated in angiogenesis and multiple other processes6–9, but angiogenesis is the main target of drugs like sunitinib10. HIF-2, a transcription factor, has been regarded as undruggable11. A structure-based design approach identified a selective HIF-2 antagonist (PT2399) that we evaluate using a tumorgraft (TG)/PDX platform12,13. PT2399 dissociated HIF-2 (an obligatory heterodimer [HIF-2α/HIF-1β])14 in human ccRCC suppressing tumorigenesis in 56% (10/18) lines. PT2399 had greater activity than sunitinib, was active in sunitinib-progressing tumors, and was better tolerated. Unexpectedly, some VHL-mutant ccRCCs were resistant. Resistance occurred despite HIF-2 dissociation in tumors and evidence of Hif-2 inhibition in the mouse as determined by suppression of circulating erythropoietin, a HIF-2 target15 and possible pharmacodynamic marker. We identified a HIF-2-dependent gene signature in sensitive tumors. Illustrating drug specificity, gene expression was largely unaffected by PT2399 in resistant tumors. Sensitive tumors exhibited a distinguishing gene expression signature, and generally higher HIF-2α levels. Prolonged PT2399 treatment led to resistance. We identified a binding site and second site suppressor mutation in HIF-2α and HIF-1β respectively. Both mutations preserved HIF-2 dimers despite treatment with PT2399. Finally, an extensively pretreated patient with a sensitive TG had disease control for >11 months with the close analogue PT2385. We validate HIF-2 as a target in ccRCC, show that some ccRCC are, unexpectedly, HIF-2 independent, and set the stage for biomarker-driven clinical trials.
SUMMARY Background Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) displays a variety of clinical behaviors. However, the molecular genetic events driving these behaviors are unknown. We discovered that BAP1 is mutated in approximately 15% of ccRCC and that BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations are largely mutually exclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological significance of these molecular subtypes and to determine whether patients with BAP1-mutant and PBRM1-mutant tumors had different overall survival. Methods In this retrospective analysis, we assessed 145 patients with primary clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma and defined PBRM1 and BAP1 mutation status from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW), TX, USA, between 1998 and 2011. We classified patients into those with BAP1-mutant tumors and those with tumors exclusively mutated for PBRM1 (PBRM1-mutant). We used a second independent cohort (n=327) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for validation. In both cohorts, more than 80% of patients had localized or locoregional disease at presentation. Overall both cohorts were similar, although the TCGA had more patients with metastatic and higher-grade disease, and more TCGA patients presented before molecularly targeted therapies became available. Findings The median overall survival in the UTSW cohort was significantly shorter for patients with BAP1-mutant tumors (4.6 years; 95% CI 2.1-7.2), than for patients with PBRM1-mutant tumors (10.6 years; 9.8-11.5), corresponding to a HR of 2.7 (95% CI 0.99-7.6, p=0.044). Median overall survival in the TCGA cohort was 1.9 years (95% CI 0.6-3.3) for patients with BAP1-mutant tumors and 5.4 years (4.0-6.8) for those with PBRM1-mutant tumors. A HR similar to the UTSW cohort was noted in the TCGA cohort (2.8; 95% CI 1.4-5.9; p=0.004). Patients with mutations in both BAP1 and PBRM1, although a minority (three in UTSW cohort and four in TCGA cohort), had the worst overall survival (median 2.1 years, 95% CI 0.3-3.8, for the UTSW cohort, and 0.2 years, 0.0-1.2, for the TCGA cohort). Interpretation Our findings identify mutation-defined subtypes of ccRCC with distinct clinical outcomes, a high-risk BAP1-mutant group and a favorable PBRM1-mutant group. These data establish the basis for a molecular genetic classification of ccRCC that could influence treatment decisions in the future. The existence of different molecular subtypes with disparate outcomes should be considered in the design and evaluation of clinical studies. Funding Cancer Prevention and Research Institution of Texas and NCI.
Summary Growth of prostate cancer cells is dependent upon androgen stimulation of the androgen receptor (AR). Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the most potent androgen, is usually synthesized in the prostate from testosterone secreted by the testis. Following chemical or surgical castration, prostate cancers usually shrink owing to testosterone deprivation. However, tumors often recur, forming castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we show that CRPC sometimes expresses a gain-of-stability mutation leading to a gain-of-function in 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (3βHSD1), which catalyzes the initial rate-limiting step in the conversion of the adrenal-derived steroid dehydroepiandrosterone to DHT. The mutation (N367T) does not affect catalytic function, but it renders the enzyme resistant to ubiquitination and degradation, leading to profound accumulation. Whereas dehydroepiandrosterone conversion to DHT is usually very limited, expression of 367T accelerates this conversion and provides the DHT necessary to activate the AR. We suggest that 3βHSD1 is a valid target for the treatment of CRPC.
To further understand the molecular distinctions between kidney cancer subtypes, we analyzed exome, transcriptome and copy number alteration data from 167 primary human tumors that included renal oncocytomas and non–clear cell renal cell carcinomas (nccRCCs), consisting of papillary (pRCC), chromophobe (chRCC) and translocation (tRCC) subtypes. We identified ten significantly mutated genes in pRCC, including MET, NF2, SLC5A3, PNKD and CPQ. MET mutations occurred in 15% (10/65) of pRCC samples and included previously unreported recurrent activating mutations. In chRCC, we found TP53, PTEN, FAAH2, PDHB, PDXDC1 and ZNF765 to be significantly mutated. Gene expression analysis identified a five-gene set that enabled the molecular classification of chRCC, renal oncocytoma and pRCC. Using RNA sequencing, we identified previously unreported gene fusions, including ACTG1-MITF fusion. Ectopic expression of the ACTG1-MITF fusion led to cellular transformation and induced the expression of downstream target genes. Finally, we observed upregulation of the anti-apoptotic factor BIRC7 in MiTF-high RCC tumors, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for BIRC7 inhibitors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.