Introduction: Imaging tests are essential for diagnosis in the emergency context and convey clinical information that is essential to assess the appropriateness of the tests and improve their interpretation. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the imaging tests requested by the Emergency Department in a district hospital.Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed computed tomography and ultrasound scans requested by the Emergency Department at the Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve and considered the following variables: requested test, clinical information provided (complete/incomplete), appropriateness of the test (appropriate/inappropriate), outcome (presence/absence of relevant findings) and findings related to the clinical information (yes/no). Pearson’s chi-squared and odds ratio association tests were used to evaluate the statistical association between the variables.Results: Out of 1427 requests, only 219 (15.3%) were considered to have complete clinical information. Nonetheless, 1075 (75.3%) requests were considered appropriate. Relevant findings were present in about one-third (n = 453; 31.7%) and most of these findings were related to the clinical context (n = 410; 90.5%). There was a significant association between test appropriateness and the presence of relevant findings in the test (p < 0.001). The odds ratio of having a relevant finding was 5.0 times higher in the tests considered appropriate when compared with those classified as inappropriate (CI = 3.4 - 7.3; p < 0.001).Discussion: The fact that appropriate tests potentiate the probability of having a relevant finding emphasizes the importance of defining guidelines so that only the adequate tests are performed.Conclusion: Creating guidelines should improve the appropriateness of imaging tests requested in the Emergency Department, yielding their result, with the consequent rationalization of the available resources.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background and Aims Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) is currently the first option as renal replacement therapy to many patients, for several reasons, as personal flexibility, volemic management in cardiorenal patients, poor vascular access to dialysis, among others. Mechanical complications can be a drawback in these patients, which may occur during or after catheter placement. Abdominal wall hernias and dialysate leaks are relatively common and highly related to chronically increased intraperitoneal pressure. In this setting CT peritoneography is the technique of choice as it allows differentiation between a true hernia or a wall leakage. Method We describe a case of a 69-year-old man, with a personal history of polycystic kidney disease, colonic diverticulosis and hypertension, which opted for PD. The patient later developed a mechanical complication for which a proper diagnostic approach, namely through specific imaging, and surgical planning were essential. Results After 15 months without complications, it was detected a bulging in the periumbilical area, exacerbated by orthostatism. Changes in dialytic prescription included lower dialytic volumes during orthostatic period, with some improvements. The limitation of volumes and difficulty of drainage were limiting dialytic prescription and insufficient kt/V. An ultrasound (figure 1) and CT peritoneography (figure 2) were performed, revealing an hernial sac with peritoneal liquid leak, without any intestinal loop, approachable by minimally invasive surgery and local anesthesia. Mini-laparotomy was performed, hernial sac was removed, without peritoneum aperture, with only a 4-day pause on PD technique. Conclusion CT peritoneography allowed the differentiation between this true hernia and a wall leakage, by providing accurate anatomical detail, allowing proper planning of surgical intervention. In this case, the patient had additional predisposing factors, namely polycystic kidney disease. Moreover, only a short pause on PD was necessary. Although some limitations exist, such as the use of iodinated contrast material and ionizating radiations, CT peritoneography is currently the gold standard for the evaluation of mechanical complications in PD; in addition to those mentioned, it is also useful for complications related to the catheter (kinking, entrapment, malposition), intrabdominal adhesions or loculated fluid collections.