Background: There is a growing interest in reporting satisfaction levels of transgender women undergoing vaginoplasty surgery. The lack of information regarding satisfaction during the initial experience of the vaginoplasty technique, and the moderate morbidity related to the surgery, could discourage the immersion of new groups in initiating a program of this kind. Therefore, we aim to report patients' level of satisfaction during our initial experience in the penile inversion vaginoplasty technique.Methods: Retrospective study of patients who underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty in our center between September 2019 and August 2021. Surgery technique, demographic data, preoperative clinical variables, and short and long-term follow-up are described. Six months after surgery, a survey elaborated by the research team was conducted by phone. The score goes from 1 to 5, and it evaluates satisfaction on esthetics, functional, psychosocial, and global aspects.Results: Twenty patients underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty in our center during the described period. The average age was 35.6 years old, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 kg/m 2 , and they presented low comorbidity. Half of the patients presented at least one complication, most of which were minor. One patient was urgently reoperated due to bleeding, and three patients were reoperated on a scheduled basis from minor surgeries. 90% of the patients answered the questionnaire. The most common answers to all four areas covered (esthetics, functional, psychosocial, and global) were satisfied or very satisfied, resulting in a mean over four points in each one of the sections. Lastly, 94.4% of the patients reported being satisfied with their choice of having undergone surgery.Conclusions: Our initial experience in penile inversion vaginoplasty reveals good satisfaction results at short follow up.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men and the fifth leading cause of death from cancer. The possibility of sarcopenia being a prognostic factor in advanced PCa patients has recently become a subject of interest. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in advanced prostate carcinoma. A systematic review was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science (March, 2021). The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Meta-analyses for overall, cancer-specific, and progression-free survival were performed. Nine studies (n = 1659) were included. Sarcopenia was borderline associated with a shorter overall survival (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.44, P = 0.04, I2 = 43%) but was significantly associated with progression-free survival (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.06, P < 0.01; k = 3; n = 588). Available evidence supports sarcopenia as an important prognostic factor of progression-free survival in patients with advanced PCa. However, sarcopenia has a weak association with a shorter overall survival. The evidence on the role of sarcopenia in prostate-cancer-specific survival is insufficient and supports the need for further research. Patient summary: The literature was reviewed to determine whether the loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) affects the survival in patients with advanced PCa. Patients with advanced PCa and sarcopenia were found to have a shorter progression-free survival (the length of time during and after treatment of a cancer that the patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse), but sarcopenia did not have much influence on the overall survival and cancer-specific survival (the length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment to the date of death due to the cancer).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.