Precipitation has a strong and constant impact on different economic sectors, environment, and social activities all over the world. An increasing interest for monitoring and estimating the precipitation characteristics can be claimed in the last decades. However, in some areas the ground-based network is still sparse and the spatial data coverage insufficiently addresses the needs. In the last decades, different interpolation methods provide an efficient response for describing the spatial distribution of precipitation. In this study, we compare the performance of seven interpolation methods used for retrieving the mean annual precipitation over the mainland Portugal, as follows: local polynomial interpolation (LPI), global polynomial interpolation (GPI), radial basis function (RBF), inverse distance weighted (IDW), ordinary cokriging (OCK), universal cokriging (UCK) and empirical Bayesian kriging regression (EBKR). We generate the mean annual precipitation distribution using data from 128 rain gauge stations covering the period 1991 to 2000. The interpolation results were evaluated using cross-validation techniques and the performance of each method was evaluated using mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) and Taylor diagram. The results indicate that EBKR performs the best spatial distribution. In order to determine the accuracy of spatial distribution generated by the spatial interpolation methods, we calculate the prediction standard error (PSE). The PSE result of EBKR prediction over mainland Portugal increases form south to north.
An analysis of 17 years of half-hourly aeronautic observations (METAR) and special observations (SPECI) in the three international airports of mainland Portugal indicates strong variations in fog properties. Fog is a rare event at Faro, a winter phenomenon in Lisbon and mainly a summer process at Porto. At both Lisbon and Porto, fog is favoured by specific synoptic circulations, here classified into a set of weather types, compatible with the strict requirements of fog formation. At the same time, however, a detailed analysis of the distribution of fog, and the classification of its onset processes, reveal a crucial dependence on local wind. This suggests that the advection of moist air from nearby sources, from the Tagus estuary at Lisbon and from the ocean at Porto, is the dominant process at both locations, despite the large differences found in the timing of those fog processes. The observational data (METAR) prior to the fog formation is used to classify the fog generation mechanism for 96.9% of the fog events at Porto, and 98.9% at Lisbon. Among the five fog types identified using a classification algorithm, cloud base lowering is the most common one at both locations, gathering half of the classified fog events, followed by advection, precipitation, and radiation. No fog event of the evaporation type was detected at both airports. The analysis of the observed horizontal visibility during the fog events revealed that cloud base lowering and radiation fog are the most intense events. The median of the minimum horizontal visibility of these two types of fog varies between 150 and 250 m, as the average ranges between 217.8 and 312.9 m. The study results have revealed a promising prefog diagnosis tool to be explored in detail in further operational context studies.
Over the last decades, climatic changes have triggered considerable impacts across the globe with detrimental effects on all ecosystems. Given the complexity of topography and climate, Romania is one of the most exposed countries in the South‐Eastern Europe to extreme hydrological events. As a consequence, the spatial distribution of precipitation is of greater importance for future analysis. This study examines the performance of Empirical Bayesian Kriging Regression Prediction (EBKRP) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to predict the spatial distribution of annual and seasonal precipitation over Romania. Twelve co‐variables derived from topography, and remote sensing products data were used to improve the prediction. The co‐variable selection process was performed prior to the regression model to reduce the complexity and processing time, using the Boruta Algorithm (BA), which is an innovative approach. The performance of BA was compared with Gini Coefficient. Our findings confirmed that 10 co‐variables were relevant to predict annual precipitation and nine for seasonal. The overall prediction of precipitation is more influenced by topography (altitude, slope, surface roughness) and the distance to marine bodies (Black Sea and Adriatic Sea). Cross‐validation and five statistical metrics were applied to assess the performance of the regression models. The results show similar spatial distribution pattern of precipitation, whereas the highest annual precipitation is found in the Carpathian Mountains (EBKRP: 1,399.2 mm, GWR: 1,249.7 mm) and the lowest in the lowlands (EBKRP: 355.9 mm, GWR: 346.8 mm). For seasons, both methods predicted the highest precipitation in summer and lowest in autumn. In all seasons, the precipitation is underestimated by both methods, however, for annual, only GWR does so. Our study revealed GWR as the best method to predict annual and seasonal precipitation over Romania, as it yielded the highest correlation coefficient Spearman (S), Pearson (P), determination coefficient (R2) and lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE).
The prediction of fog is a challenging task in operational weather forecast. Due to its dependency on small-scale processes, numerical weather models struggle to deal with under scale features, resulting in uncertainties in the fog forecast. Unawareness of the onset time and the duration of fog leads to disproportionate impact on open-air activities, especially in aviation. Nevertheless, in a small sized country such as Portugal mainland, the fog varies greatly. The traffic of the two busiest Portuguese international airports of Porto and Lisbon is affected by the occurrence of fog at different times of the year. The fog occurrence at Porto is a predominant winter phenomenon and a summer one at Lisbon. Observational variables and their trend are local indicators of favouring conditions to the fog’s onset, such as cooling, water vapour saturation and turbulent mixing. A dataset corresponding to 17 years of half-hourly METAR from the airports of Porto and Lisbon is used to diagnose the pre-fog conditioning. Two diagnostic models are proposed to assess pre-fog conditions. The first model is adapted from the statistical method proposed by Menut et al. (2014), which performs a diagnosis from key variables trend, such as temperature, wind speed and relative humidity. Thresholds are defined from the METAR samples in the 6 h period prior to the formation of fog. Due to the local character of fog, the presented thresholds are the most appropriate ones for each airport. The predictability of fog is then assessed using observations. The second approach consists of neural networks such as a fully connected (FC) network and a recurrent neural network (RNN), which are especially well suited for time series. By experimenting with different types of neural networks (NN), we will try to capture the connection between the temporal evolution of measured variables in the dataset and the fog onset. These experiments will include different time windows to measure its influence on prediction performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.