Increasing the total light dose delivered to the tumor increases the odds of having a permanent neurologic deficit but does not increase survival or time to tumor progression. There was no difference in local or marginal recurrence with increasing light dose. Recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas tend to do better than recurrent glioblastomas with PDT.
Background and Objective:The primary goal was to determine the maximal tolerable light dose that can be administered to patients undergoing multifiber interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) of malignant brain tumors at a fixed dose of photosensitizer. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients (12 glioblastomas, 5 anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 malignant ependymoma) were included in this study. The total light dose delivered to the tumor was divided into three groups of six patients each: 1,500-3,700 J, 3,700-4,400 J, and 4,400-5,900 J. Results: Five patients (all glioblastomas) demonstrated postoperative permanent neurologic deficits. None of the patients in 1,500-3,700 J, two patients in 3,700-4,400 J, and three patients in 4,400-5,900 J had neurologic deficits. Glioblastomas recurred more often than anaplastic astrocytomas. Increasing the light dose did not make a difference in local/regional control of glioblastomas. Patients with anaplastic astrocytomas survived (mean, 493 days) longer than patients with glioblastomas (mean, 116.5 days) after PDT. Four patients had prolonged survival (more than a year) after PDT. Conclusions: Increasing the total light dose delivered to the tumor increases the odds of having a permanent neurologic deficit but does not increase survival or time to tumor progression. There was no difference in local or marginal recurrence with increasing light dose. Recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas tend to do better than recurrent glioblastomas with PDT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.